Horton

Re: Fast default stuff versus pg_upgrade

Peter Geoghegan <pg@bowt.ie>

View thread View on postgr.es
From: Peter Geoghegan <pg@bowt.ie>
To: Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com>
Cc: Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>, Andres Freund <andres@anarazel.de>, Andrew Dunstan <andrew@dunslane.net>, PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers@lists.postgresql.org>
Date: 2018-06-19T17:23:29Z
Lists: pgsql-hackers 
On Tue, Jun 19, 2018 at 10:12 AM, Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com> wrote:
> I have to admit that I think this feature is scary. I'm not sure that
> it was adequately reviewed and tested, and I'm worried this may not be
> the only problem it causes. But this particular problem, as Andres
> says, doesn't seem like anything we can't fix with acceptable risk.

I agree with both points.

-- 
Peter Geoghegan

Commits

  1. Allow for pg_upgrade of attributes with missing values