Re: Adding skip scan (including MDAM style range skip scan) to nbtree

Peter Geoghegan <pg@bowt.ie>

From: Peter Geoghegan <pg@bowt.ie>
To: Tomas Vondra <tomas@vondra.me>
Cc: Mark Dilger <mark.dilger@enterprisedb.com>, Heikki Linnakangas <hlinnaka@iki.fi>, pgsql-hackers@lists.postgresql.org, Matthias van de Meent <boekewurm+postgres@gmail.com>
Date: 2025-05-09T17:30:01Z
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Commits

Same data as JSON: GET /api/v1/messages/:b64id/commits the thread's linked commits as JSON, with link sources. API reference →
  1. nbtree: Always set skipScan flag on rescan.

  2. meson: Build numeric.c with -ftree-vectorize.

  3. Fix "variable not found in subplan target lists" in semijoin de-duplication.

  4. Revert "nbtree: Remove useless row compare arg."

  5. nbtree: Remove useless row compare arg.

  6. Prevent premature nbtree array advancement.

  7. nbtree: tighten up array recheck rules.

  8. Avoid treating nonrequired nbtree keys as required.

  9. Adjust overstrong nbtree skip array assertion.

  10. Make NULL tuple values always advance skip arrays.

  11. Avoid extra index searches through preprocessing.

  12. Improve nbtree skip scan primitive scan scheduling.

  13. Further optimize nbtree search scan key comparisons.

  14. Add nbtree skip scan optimization.

  15. Improve nbtree array primitive scan scheduling.

  16. nbtree: Make BTMaxItemSize into object-like macro.

  17. Show index search count in EXPLAIN ANALYZE, take 2.

  18. Make parallel nbtree index scans use an LWLock.

  19. Show index search count in EXPLAIN ANALYZE.

  20. Avoid nbtree parallel scan currPos confusion.

  21. nbtree: Remove useless 'strat' local variable.

  22. Normalize nbtree truncated high key array behavior.

  23. Refactor handling of nbtree array redundancies.

  24. Fix nbtree pgstats accounting with parallel scans.

  25. Avoid parallel nbtree index scan hangs with SAOPs.

  26. Show Parallel Bitmap Heap Scan worker stats in EXPLAIN ANALYZE

  27. Enhance nbtree ScalarArrayOp execution.

  28. Skip checking of scan keys required for directional scan in B-tree

  29. Instead of using a numberOfRequiredKeys count to distinguish required

On Fri, May 9, 2025 at 8:58 AM Tomas Vondra <tomas@vondra.me> wrote:
>   select count(*) from pgbench_accounts where bid = 0

What kind of plan are you getting? Are you sure it's index-only scans?

With 100 partitions, I get a parallel sequential scan when I run
EXPLAIN ANALYZE with this query from psql -- though only with "bid =
1". With your original "bid = 0" query I do get index-only scans.

What ends up happening (when index-only scans are used) is that we
scan only one index leaf page per partition index scanned. The
individual index-only scans don't need to scan too much (even when the
"bid = 1" variant query is forced to use index-only similar scans), so
I guess it's plausible that something like a regression in
preprocessing could be to blame, after all. As I mentioned just now,
these indexes each have only one index leaf page (the thing about 85
leaf pages only applies when partitioning isn't in use).

I find that the execution time for index-only scans with "bid = 0"
with a warm cache are:

Planning Time: 0.720 ms
Serialization: time=0.001 ms  output=1kB  format=text
Execution Time: 0.311 ms

Whereas the execution times for index-only scans with "bid = 1" are:

Planning Time: 0.713 ms
Serialization: time=0.001 ms  output=1kB  format=text
Execution Time: 16.491 ms

So you can see why I'd find it so hard to believe that any underlying
regression wouldn't at least be well hidden (by all of the other
overhead) in the case of the "bid = 1" variant query. There's no
reason to expect the absolute number of cycles added by some
hypothetical regression in preprocessing to vary among these two
variants of your count(*) query.

-- 
Peter Geoghegan