Re: Local partitioned indexes and pageinspect
Peter Geoghegan <pg@bowt.ie>
From: Peter Geoghegan <pg@bowt.ie>
To: Michael Paquier <michael@paquier.xyz>
Cc: Alvaro Herrera <alvherre@2ndquadrant.com>, PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers@lists.postgresql.org>
Date: 2018-04-30T01:20:02Z
Lists: pgsql-hackers
On Mon, Apr 23, 2018 at 9:58 PM, Michael Paquier <michael@paquier.xyz> wrote: > Hm, the docs about taking backups with the low-level APIs don't care > much about relkind now: > https://www.postgresql.org/docs/devel/static/continuous-archiving.html#BACKUP-LOWLEVEL-BASE-BACKUP > Or do you have another section in the docs in mind? No, I didn't. We should definitely document new relkinds in the pg_class docs, though. > Does the attached patch address everything you have seen? What about amcheck? I did change the example query in the docs to account for this, so anyone that generalizes from that won't have a problem, but it would be nice if it had a friendlier message. I didn't change amcheck to account for this myself because I thought it was possible that somebody else would want to use a more general solution. -- Peter Geoghegan
Commits
-
pgstatindex, pageinspect: handle partitioned indexes
- bef5fcc36be3 11.0 landed
-
Add relkind 'I' to catalog.sgml's list relkinds
- 550091f218ce 11.0 landed