Re: New IndexAM API controlling index vacuum strategies
Peter Geoghegan <pg@bowt.ie>
From: Peter Geoghegan <pg@bowt.ie>
To: Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com>
Cc: Masahiko Sawada <sawada.mshk@gmail.com>,
Andres Freund <andres@anarazel.de>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org>,
Noah Misch <noah@leadboat.com>
Date: 2021-04-02T03:25:06Z
Lists: pgsql-hackers
On Thu, Apr 1, 2021 at 6:14 AM Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com> wrote: > Without offering an opinion on this particular implementation choice, > +1 for the idea of trying to make the table-with-indexes and the > table-without-indexes cases work in ways that will feel similar to the > user. Tables without indexes are probably rare in practice, but if > some behaviors are implemented for one case and not the other, it will > probably be confusing. One thought here is that it might help to try > to write documentation for whatever behavior you choose. If it's hard > to document without weasel-words, maybe it's not the best approach. I have found a way to do this that isn't too painful, a little like the VACUUM_FSM_EVERY_PAGES thing. I've also found a way to further simplify the table-without-indexes case: make it behave like a regular two-pass/has-indexes VACUUM with regard to visibility map stuff when the page doesn't need a call to lazy_vacuum_heap() (because there are no LP_DEAD items to set LP_UNUSED on the page following pruning). But when it does call lazy_vacuum_heap(), the call takes care of everything for lazy_scan_heap(), which just continues to the next page due to considering prunestate to have been "invalidated" by the call to lazy_vacuum_heap(). So there is absolutely minimal special case code for the table-without-indexes case now. BTW I removed all of the lazy_scan_heap() utility functions from the second patch in my working copy of the patch series. You were right about that -- they weren't useful. We should just have the pruning wrapper function I've called lazy_scan_prune(), not any of the others. We only need one local variable in the lazy_vacuum_heap() that isn't either the prune state set/returned by lazy_scan_prune(), or generic stuff like a Buffer variable. -- Peter Geoghegan
Commits
Same data as JSON:
GET /api/v1/messages/:b64id/commits
the thread's linked commits as JSON, with link sources.
API reference →
-
Don't truncate heap when VACUUM's failsafe is in effect.
- 60f1f09ff443 14.0 landed
-
Teach VACUUM to bypass unnecessary index vacuuming.
- 5100010ee4d5 14.0 landed
-
Add wraparound failsafe to VACUUM.
- 1e55e7d1755c 14.0 landed
-
Truncate line pointer array during VACUUM.
- 3c3b8a4b2689 14.0 landed
-
Remove tupgone special case from vacuumlazy.c.
- 8523492d4e34 14.0 landed
-
Refactor lazy_scan_heap() loop.
- 7ab96cf6b312 14.0 landed
-
Propagate parallel VACUUM's buffer access strategy.
- 49f49defe7c0 14.0 cited
-
Simplify state managed by VACUUM.
- b4af70cb2103 14.0 landed
-
Notice that heap page has dead items during VACUUM.
- 0ea71c93a06d 14.0 landed
-
Adjust lazy_scan_heap() accounting comments.
- 7cde6b13a9b6 14.0 cited
-
Use full 64-bit XID for checking if a deleted GiST page is old enough.
- 6655a7299d83 13.0 cited
-
Fix some problems with VACUUM (INDEX_CLEANUP FALSE).
- dd6959798885 12.0 cited