Re: Code of Conduct plan
Peter Geoghegan <pg@bowt.ie>
From: Peter Geoghegan <pg@bowt.ie>
To: Benjamin Scherrey <scherrey@proteus-tech.com>
Cc: Christophe Pettus <xof@thebuild.com>,
"Joshua D. Drake" <jd@commandprompt.com>, Chris Travers <chris.travers@gmail.com>, "pgsql-generallists.postgresql.org" <pgsql-general@lists.postgresql.org>
Date: 2018-06-05T20:25:57Z
Lists: pgsql-hackers, pgsql-general
On Tue, Jun 5, 2018 at 12:20 PM, Benjamin Scherrey <scherrey@proteus-tech.com> wrote: > I keep hearing this claim. I've followed up and tried to verify them. Sorry > but "trust me" doesn't cut it here any more than "trust me this will make > Postgres go faster" would on a code change. What's the context for this? > What evidence do we have that indicates this CoC would have likely resulted > in a different outcome? Without that then your claim does not even rise up > to the standard of theoretical. Frankly this claim does not seem very > plausible to me at all. Let's try to keep our standards here. Whose standards are these? By my count, the majority of e-mails you've ever sent to a PostgreSQL mailing list have been sent in the last 2 days, to this code of conduct thread. -- Peter Geoghegan