Re: Code of Conduct plan

Peter Geoghegan <pg@bowt.ie>

From: Peter Geoghegan <pg@bowt.ie>
To: Benjamin Scherrey <scherrey@proteus-tech.com>
Cc: Christophe Pettus <xof@thebuild.com>, "Joshua D. Drake" <jd@commandprompt.com>, Chris Travers <chris.travers@gmail.com>, "pgsql-generallists.postgresql.org" <pgsql-general@lists.postgresql.org>
Date: 2018-06-05T20:25:57Z
Lists: pgsql-hackers, pgsql-general
On Tue, Jun 5, 2018 at 12:20 PM, Benjamin Scherrey
<scherrey@proteus-tech.com> wrote:
> I keep hearing this claim. I've followed up and tried to verify them. Sorry
> but "trust me" doesn't cut it here any more than "trust me this will make
> Postgres go faster" would on a code change. What's the context for this?
> What evidence do we have that indicates this CoC would have likely resulted
> in a different outcome? Without that then your claim does not even rise up
> to the standard of theoretical. Frankly this claim does not seem very
> plausible to me at all. Let's try to keep our standards here.

Whose standards are these? By my count, the majority of e-mails you've
ever sent to a PostgreSQL mailing list have been sent in the last 2
days, to this code of conduct thread.

-- 
Peter Geoghegan