GlobalVisIsRemovableFullXid() vs GlobalVisCheckRemovableXid()

Peter Geoghegan <pg@bowt.ie>

From: Peter Geoghegan <pg@bowt.ie>

To: Andres Freund <andres@anarazel.de>

Cc: PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers@lists.postgresql.org>

Date: 2021-02-06T20:27:30Z

Lists: pgsql-hackers

Why is GlobalVisIsRemovableFullXid() not named
GlobalVisCheckRemovableFullXid() instead? ISTM that that name makes
much more sense, since it is what I'd expect for a function that is
the "Full XID equivalent" of GlobalVisCheckRemovableXid().

Note also that GlobalVisIsRemovableFullXid() is the only symbol name
matching "GlobalVisIsRemovable*".

Have I missed something?

-- 
Peter Geoghegan

Commits

ReadNewTransactionId() -> ReadNextTransactionId().
- c7ecd6af010e 14.0 landed
Rename removable xid function for consistency.
- 617fffee8a6f 14.0 landed
Add basic infrastructure for 64 bit transaction IDs.
- 2fc7af5e9660 12.0 cited