Re: WIP: Covering + unique indexes.
Peter Geoghegan <pg@bowt.ie>
On Wed, Apr 18, 2018 at 1:45 PM, Peter Geoghegan <pg@bowt.ie> wrote: > I suggest committing this patch as-is. Actually, I see one tiny issue with extra '*' characters here: > + * The number of attributes won't be explicitly represented if the > + * negative infinity tuple was generated during a page split that > + * occurred with a version of Postgres before v11. There must be a > + * problem when there is an explicit representation that is > + * non-zero, * or when there is no explicit representation and the > + * tuple is * evidently not a pre-pg_upgrade tuple. I also suggest fixing this indentation before commit: > + /* > + *Cannot leak memory here, TupleDescCopy() doesn't allocate any > + * inner structure, so, plain pfree() should clean all allocated memory > + */ -- Peter Geoghegan
Commits
-
Adjust INCLUDE index truncation comments and code.
- 075aade4361b 11.0 landed
-
Add commentary explaining why MaxIndexTuplesPerPage calculation is safe.
- 2a67d6440db4 11.0 cited
-
Indexes with INCLUDE columns and their support in B-tree
- 8224de4f42cc 11.0 landed
-
Add amcheck verification of heap relations belonging to btree indexes.
- 7f563c09f890 11.0 cited
-
Doc: move info for btree opclass implementors into main documentation.
- 3785f7eee3d9 11.0 cited
-
Doc: mention that you can't PREPARE TRANSACTION after NOTIFY.
- e4fbf22831c2 11.0 cited
-
Remove dedicated B-tree root-split record types.
- 0c504a80cf2e 11.0 cited
-
Restructure index access method API to hide most of it at the C level.
- 65c5fcd353a8 9.6.0 cited
-
Split _bt_insertonpg to two functions.
- bc292937ae6a 8.3.0 cited
-
Major overhaul of btree index code. Eliminate special BTP_CHAIN logic for
- 9e85183bfc31 7.1.1 cited