Re: [PATCH] Clarify the behavior of the system when approaching XID wraparound

On Tue, May 2, 2023 at 6:46 PM John Naylor <john.naylor@enterprisedb.com> wrote:
> It might least be good for readability to gloss over the warning and only quote the MXID limit error message, but we'll have to see how it looks.

Apparently you expect me to join you in pretending that you didn't
lambast my review on this thread less than 24 hours ago [1]. I happen
to believe that this particular patch is of great strategic
importance, so I'll admit that I thought about it for a second. But
just a second -- I have more self-respect than that.

That's not the only reason, though. I also genuinely don't have the
foggiest notion what was behind what you said. In particular, this
part still makes zero sense to me:

"Claim that others are holding you back, and then try to move the
goalposts in their work"

Let me get this straight: "Moving the goalposts of their work" refers
to something *I* did to *you*, on *this* thread...right?

If anything, I'm biased in *favor* of this patch. The fact that you
seem to think that I was being obstructionist just doesn't make any
sense to me, at all. I really don't know where to go from there. I'm
not so much upset as baffled.

[1] https://postgr.es/m/CAFBsxsGJMp43QO2cLAh0==ueYVL35pbbEHeXZ0cnZkU=q8sFkg@mail.gmail.com
--
Peter Geoghegan