Re: New strategies for freezing, advancing relfrozenxid early

Peter Geoghegan <pg@bowt.ie>

From: Peter Geoghegan <pg@bowt.ie>
To: Jeff Davis <pgsql@j-davis.com>
Cc: Matthias van de Meent <boekewurm+postgres@gmail.com>, John Naylor <john.naylor@enterprisedb.com>, Andres Freund <andres@anarazel.de>, Justin Pryzby <pryzby@telsasoft.com>, PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers@lists.postgresql.org>
Date: 2023-01-02T19:45:11Z
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Attachments

On Sat, Dec 31, 2022 at 12:45 PM Peter Geoghegan <pg@bowt.ie> wrote:
> On Sat, Dec 31, 2022 at 11:46 AM Jeff Davis <pgsql@j-davis.com> wrote:
> > "We have no freeze plans to execute, so there's no cost to following
> > the freeze path. This is important in the case where the page is
> > entirely frozen already, so that the page will be marked as such in the
> > VM."
>
> I'm happy to use your wording instead -- I'll come up with a patch for that.

What do you think of the wording adjustments in the attached patch?
It's based on your suggested wording.

--
Peter Geoghegan

Commits

  1. Revert "Add eager and lazy freezing strategies to VACUUM."

  2. Add eager and lazy freezing strategies to VACUUM.

  3. Refine the definition of page-level freezing.

  4. Avoid special XID snapshotConflictHorizon values.

  5. Add page-level freezing to VACUUM.

  6. Remove overzealous MultiXact freeze assertion.

  7. Refactor how VACUUM passes around its XID cutoffs.

  8. Deduplicate freeze plans in freeze WAL records.

  9. Set relfrozenxid to oldest extant XID seen by VACUUM.

  10. Only skip pages marked as clean in the visibility map, if the last 32

  11. Add vacuum_freeze_table_age GUC option, to control when VACUUM should