Re: Removing more vacuumlazy.c special cases, relfrozenxid optimizations
Peter Geoghegan <pg@bowt.ie>
On Thu, Mar 31, 2022 at 10:50 AM Andres Freund <andres@anarazel.de> wrote: > > So, to be clear: vac_update_relstats() never actually considered the > > new relfrozenxid value from its vacuumlazy.c caller to be "in the > > future"? > > No, I added separate debug messages for those, and also applied your patch, > and it didn't trigger. The assert is "Assert(diff > 0)", and not "Assert(diff >= 0)". Plus the other related assert I mentioned did not trigger. So when this "diff" assert did trigger, the value of "diff" must have been 0 (not a negative value). While this state does technically indicate that the "existing" relfrozenxid value (actually a stale version) appears to be "in the future" (because the OldestXmin XID might still never have been allocated), it won't ever be in the future according to vac_update_relstats() (even if it used that version). I suppose that I might be wrong about that, somehow -- anything is possible. The important point is that there is currently no evidence that this bug (or any very recent bug) could ever allow vac_update_relstats() to actually believe that it needs to update relfrozenxid/relminmxid, purely because the existing value is in the future. The fact that vac_update_relstats() doesn't log/warn when this happens is very unfortunate, but there is nevertheless no evidence that that would have informed us of any bug on HEAD, even including the actual bug here, which is a bug in vacuumlazy.c (not in vac_update_relstats). > I do think we should apply a version of the warnings you have (with a WARNING > instead of PANIC obviously). I think it's bordering on insanity that we have > so many paths to just silently fix stuff up around vacuum. It's like we want > things to be undebuggable, and to give users no warnings about something being > up. Yeah, it's just totally self defeating to not at least log it. I mean this is a code path that is only hit once per VACUUM, so there is practically no risk of that causing any new problems. > Can you repro the issue with my recipe? FWIW, adding log_min_messages=debug5 > and fsync=off made the crash trigger more quickly. I'll try to do that today. I'm not feeling the most energetic right now, to be honest. -- Peter Geoghegan
Commits
-
Have VACUUM warn on relfrozenxid "in the future".
- e83ebfe6d767 15.0 landed
-
vacuumlazy.c: Further consolidate resource allocation.
- c42a6fc41dc2 15.0 landed
-
Generalize how VACUUM skips all-frozen pages.
- f3c15cbe5065 15.0 landed
-
Set relfrozenxid to oldest extant XID seen by VACUUM.
- 0b018fabaaba 15.0 landed
-
Doc: Add relfrozenxid Tip to XID wraparound section.
- 05023a237c05 15.0 landed
-
vacuumlazy.c: document vistest and OldestXmin.
- 73f6ec3d3c8d 15.0 cited
-
Increase hash_mem_multiplier default to 2.0.
- 8f388f6f554b 15.0 cited
-
Consolidate VACUUM xid cutoff logic.
- efa4a9462a07 15.0 landed
-
Add VACUUM instrumentation for scanned pages, relfrozenxid.
- 872770fd6ccf 15.0 landed
-
Simplify lazy_scan_heap's handling of scanned pages.
- 44fa84881fff 15.0 landed
-
Try to stabilize reloptions test, again.
- b700f96cffd9 15.0 cited
-
Unify VACUUM VERBOSE and autovacuum logging.
- 49c9d9fcfa9a 15.0 cited
-
Fix possible HOT corruption when RECENTLY_DEAD changes to DEAD while pruning.
- 18b87b201f73 15.0 cited
-
pg_resetxlog: add option to set oldest xid & use by pg_upgrade
- 74cf7d46a91d 15.0 cited
-
Teach VACUUM to bypass unnecessary index vacuuming.
- 5100010ee4d5 14.0 cited
-
Centralize horizon determination for temp tables, fixing bug due to skew.
- 94bc27b57680 14.0 cited
-
pg_surgery: Try to stabilize regression tests.
- 0811f766fd74 14.0 cited
-
Add "split after new tuple" nbtree optimization.
- f21668f328c8 12.0 cited
-
Fix bugs in vacuum of shared rels, by keeping their relcache entries current.
- a54e1f158779 11.0 cited
-
Avoid useless truncation attempts during VACUUM.
- e842908233bb 9.6.0 cited
-
Only skip pages marked as clean in the visibility map, if the last 32
- bf136cf6e376 8.4.0 cited
-
Fix recently-understood problems with handling of XID freezing, particularly
- 48188e1621bb 8.2.0 cited