Re: POC, WIP: OR-clause support for indexes
Peter Geoghegan <pg@bowt.ie>
Commits
GET /api/v1/messages/:b64id/commits
the thread's linked commits as JSON, with link sources.
API reference →
-
Make group_similar_or_args() reorder clause list as little as possible
- 775a06d44c04 18.0 landed
-
Allow usage of match_orclause_to_indexcol() for joins
- 627d63419e22 18.0 landed
-
Skip not SOAP-supported indexes while transforming an OR clause into SAOP
- 5bba0546eecb 18.0 landed
-
Remove the wrong assertion from match_orclause_to_indexcol()
- d4d11940df94 18.0 landed
-
Teach bitmap path generation about transforming OR-clauses to SAOP's
- ae4569161a27 18.0 landed
-
Transform OR-clauses to SAOP's during index matching
- d4378c0005e6 18.0 landed
-
Fix the value of or_to_any_transform_limit in postgresql.conf.sample
- 2af75e117478 17.0 landed
-
Transform OR clauses to ANY expression
- 72bd38cc99a1 17.0 landed
-
MergeAttributes code deduplication
- 64444ce071f6 17.0 cited
-
SEARCH and CYCLE clauses
- 3696a600e229 14.0 cited
-
Improve estimation of OR clauses using extended statistics.
- 25a9e54d2db3 14.0 cited
-
Teach btree to handle ScalarArrayOpExpr quals natively.
- 9e8da0f75731 9.2.0 cited
-
Revise collation derivation method and expression-tree representation.
- b310b6e31ce5 9.1.0 cited
-
Instead of trying to force WHERE clauses into CNF or DNF normal form,
- 9888192fb773 8.0.0 cited
Attachments
- saop_patch_test.sql (application/octet-stream)
On Sun, Jun 25, 2023 at 6:48 PM Alena Rybakina <lena.ribackina@yandex.ru> wrote: > I finished writing the code patch for transformation "Or" expressions to "Any" expressions. This seems interesting to me. I'm currently working on improving nbtree's "native execution of ScalarArrayOpExpr quals" (see commit 9e8da0f7 for background information). That is relevant to what you're trying to do here. Right now nbtree's handling of ScalarArrayOpExpr is rather inefficient. The executor does pass the index scan an array of constants, so the whole structure already allows the nbtree code to execute the ScalarArrayOpExpr in whatever way would be most efficient. There is only one problem: it doesn't really try to do so. It more or less just breaks down the large ScalarArrayOpExpr into "mini" queries -- one per constant. Internally, query execution isn't significantly different to executing many of these "mini" queries independently. We just sort and deduplicate the arrays. We don't intelligently decide which pages dynamically. This is related to skip scan. Attached is an example query that shows the problem. Right now the query needs to access a buffer containing an index page a total of 24 times. It's actually accessing the same 2 pages 12 times. My draft patch only requires 2 buffer accesses -- because it "coalesces the array constants together" dynamically at run time. That is a little extreme, but it's certainly possible. BTW, this project is related to skip scan. It's part of the same family of techniques -- MDAM techniques. (I suppose that that's already true for ScalarArrayOpExpr execution by nbtree, but without dynamic behavior it's not nearly as valuable as it could be.) If executing ScalarArrayOpExprs was less inefficient in these cases then the planner could be a lot more aggressive about using them. Seems like these executor improvements might go well together with what you're doing in the planner. Note that I have to "set random_page_cost=0.1" to get the planner to use all of the quals from the query as index quals. It thinks (correctly) that the query plan is very inefficient. That happens to match reality right now, but the underlying reality could change significantly. Something to think about. -- Peter Geoghegan