Horton

Re: effective_io_concurrency's steampunk spindle maths

Peter Geoghegan <pg@bowt.ie>

View thread View on postgr.es
From: Peter Geoghegan <pg@bowt.ie>
To: Thomas Munro <thomas.munro@gmail.com>
Cc: Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>, Tomas Vondra <tomas.vondra@2ndquadrant.com>, Andres Freund <andres@anarazel.de>, pgsql-hackers <pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org>
Date: 2020-05-12T18:57:52Z
Lists: pgsql-hackers 
On Sun, Mar 15, 2020 at 9:27 PM Thomas Munro <thomas.munro@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Tue, Mar 10, 2020 at 12:20 PM Thomas Munro <thomas.munro@gmail.com> wrote:
> > Here's a patch set to remove the spindle stuff, add a maintenance
> > variant, and use the maintenance one in
> > heap_compute_xid_horizon_for_tuples().
>
> Pushed.

Shouldn't you close out the "Should we rename
effective_io_concurrency?" Postgres 13 open item now?

-- 
Peter Geoghegan

Commits

  1. Introduce a maintenance_io_concurrency setting.

  2. Simplify the effective_io_concurrency setting.