Re: [BUG] Error in BRIN summarization
Peter Geoghegan <pg@bowt.ie>
From: Peter Geoghegan <pg@bowt.ie>
To: Alvaro Herrera <alvherre@2ndquadrant.com>
Cc: Anastasia Lubennikova <a.lubennikova@postgrespro.ru>, PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers@lists.postgresql.org>
Date: 2020-07-28T19:18:09Z
Lists: pgsql-hackers
On Mon, Jul 27, 2020 at 10:25 AM Alvaro Herrera <alvherre@2ndquadrant.com> wrote: > (I was also considering whether it needs to be a loop to reobtain root > tuples, in case a concurrent transaction can create a new item while > we're checking that item; but I don't think that can really happen for > one individual tuple.) I wonder if something like that is the underlying problem in a recent problem case involving a "REINDEX index pg_class_tblspc_relfilenode_index" command that runs concurrently with the regression tests: https://postgr.es/m/CAH2-WzmBxu4o=pMsniur+bwHqCGCmV_AOLkuK6BuU7ngA6evqw@mail.gmail.com We see a violation of the HOT invariant in this case, though only for a system catalog index, and only in fairly particular circumstances involving concurrency. -- Peter Geoghegan
Commits
-
Disable autovacuum for BRIN test table
- b83f1bcca0bb 13.0 landed
- 6e70443edacf 14.0 landed
- 4f47c8e7d438 12.5 landed
- 060e5bd70e4d 11.10 landed
- d4d21490376e 9.6.20 landed
- aa4da2674ca2 9.5.24 landed
- 3a45ac076aab 10.15 landed
-
Handle new HOT chains in index-build table scans
- e5902117dd83 9.6.20 landed
- a811ea5bde2f 14.0 landed
- 704de3739c5b 11.10 landed
- 40bceae7b4de 9.5.24 landed
- 385cbe8e4197 10.15 landed
- 2f29fd4cb252 13.0 landed
- 1122a903e967 12.5 landed
-
BRIN: Handle concurrent desummarization properly
- ce3a8fde8e62 9.5.24 landed
- 8782ea2f36a2 13.0 landed
- 7af39993a47c 11.10 landed
- 7a3c261fbbb4 9.6.20 landed
- 721ef4d28aae 10.15 landed
- 1f42d35a1d61 14.0 landed
- 0426c75e7d1d 12.5 landed