Horton

Re: Use of "long" in incremental sort code

Peter Geoghegan <pg@bowt.ie>

View thread View on postgr.es
From: Peter Geoghegan <pg@bowt.ie>
To: Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
Cc: James Coleman <jtc331@gmail.com>, David Rowley <dgrowleyml@gmail.com>, Tomas Vondra <tomas.vondra@2ndquadrant.com>, PostgreSQL Developers <pgsql-hackers@lists.postgresql.org>
Date: 2020-07-02T19:42:48Z
Lists: pgsql-hackers 
On Thu, Jul 2, 2020 at 12:39 PM Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote:
> mumble ssize_t mumble

That's from POSIX, though. I imagine MSVC won't be happy (surprise!).

-- 
Peter Geoghegan

Commits

  1. Use int64 instead of long in incremental sort code