Re: Improve search for missing parent downlinks in amcheck
Peter Geoghegan <pg@bowt.ie>
From: Peter Geoghegan <pg@bowt.ie>
To: Thomas Munro <thomas.munro@gmail.com>
Cc: Alexander Korotkov <a.korotkov@postgrespro.ru>,
pgsql-hackers <pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org>
Date: 2019-07-09T00:33:01Z
Lists: pgsql-hackers
On Sun, Jul 7, 2019 at 7:53 PM Thomas Munro <thomas.munro@gmail.com> wrote: > On Wed, May 1, 2019 at 12:58 PM Peter Geoghegan <pg@bowt.ie> wrote: > > I will think about a simple fix, but after the upcoming point release. > > There is no hurry. > > A bureaucratic question: What should the status be for this CF entry? I have plans to use RelationGetNumberOfBlocks() to size amcheck's downlink Bloom filter. I think that that will solve the problems with unreliable estimates of index size. which seemed to be the basis of Alexander's complaint. -- Peter Geoghegan
Commits
-
Improve checking of child pages in contrib/amcheck.
- d114cc538715 13.0 landed
-
Don't rely on estimates for amcheck Bloom filters.
- 894af78f185a 13.0 landed
- 980224b4a230 12.0 landed
- 577c8802d350 11.5 landed