Re: MERGE SQL Statement for PG11
Peter Geoghegan <pg@bowt.ie>
From: Peter Geoghegan <pg@bowt.ie>
To: Nico Williams <nico@cryptonector.com>
Cc: Simon Riggs <simon@2ndquadrant.com>, Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com>, Michael Paquier <michael.paquier@gmail.com>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org>
Date: 2017-11-07T23:31:22Z
Lists: pgsql-hackers
On Tue, Nov 7, 2017 at 3:29 PM, Nico Williams <nico@cryptonector.com> wrote: > On Thu, Nov 02, 2017 at 03:25:48PM -0700, Peter Geoghegan wrote: >> Nico Williams <nico@cryptonector.com> wrote: >> >A MERGE mapped to a DML like this: > > I needed to spend more time reading MERGE docs from other RDBMSes. Please don't hijack this thread. It's about the basic question of semantics, and is already hard enough for others to follow as-is. -- Peter Geoghegan
Commits
-
Add support for MERGE SQL command
- 7103ebb7aae8 15.0 landed
-
Add API of sorts for transition table handling in trigger.c
- 3a46a45f6f00 15.0 landed
-
Revert MERGE patch
- 08ea7a2291db 11.0 cited
-
Fix several bugs related to ON CONFLICT's EXCLUDED pseudo relation.
- ad2278379244 9.6.0 cited