Re: WAL Consistency checking for hash indexes
Kuntal Ghosh <kuntalghosh.2007@gmail.com>
From: Kuntal Ghosh <kuntalghosh.2007@gmail.com>
To: Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com>
Cc: Ashutosh Sharma <ashu.coek88@gmail.com>,
Amit Kapila <amit.kapila16@gmail.com>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org>
Date: 2017-03-15T05:57:10Z
Lists: pgsql-hackers
On Wed, Mar 15, 2017 at 12:32 AM, Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com> wrote: > On Mon, Mar 13, 2017 at 10:36 AM, Ashutosh Sharma <ashu.coek88@gmail.com> wrote: >> Couple of review comments,, >> >> You may also need to update the documentation as now we are also going >> to support wal consistency check for hash index. The current >> documentation does not include hash index. >> >> + only records originating from those resource managers. Currently, >> + the supported resource managers are <literal>heap</>, >> + <literal>heap2</>, <literal>btree</>, <literal>gin</>, >> + <literal>gist</>, <literal>sequence</>, <literal>spgist</>, >> + <literal>brin</>, and <literal>generic</>. Only > > Did that, committed this. Also ran pgindent over hash_mask() and > fixed an instance of dubious capitalization. Thanks Robert for the commit. -- Thanks & Regards, Kuntal Ghosh EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
Commits
-
Another fix for single-page hash index vacuum.
- 9abbf4727de7 10.0 landed
-
hash: Support WAL consistency checking.
- bb4a39637ac6 10.0 landed