Re: Poll: are people okay with function/operator table redesign?
Victor Yegorov <vyegorov@gmail.com>
From: Victor Yegorov <vyegorov@gmail.com>
To: Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
Cc: PostgreSQL Developers <pgsql-hackers@lists.postgresql.org>
Date: 2020-04-20T10:38:46Z
Lists: pgsql-hackers
вс, 19 апр. 2020 г. в 20:00, Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>: > In the meantime I plan to push forward with the markup approach we've > got. The editorial content should still work if we find a better > markup answer, and I'm willing to do the work of replacing the markup > as long as somebody else figures out what it should be. > I am following this thread as a frequent documentation user. While table 9.5 with functions looks quite nice, I quite dislike 9.4 with operators. Previously, I could lookup operator in the leftmost column and read on. Right now I have to look through the whole table (well, not really, but still) to find the operator. -- Victor Yegorov
Commits
-
Doc: re-re-revise markup for tables of functions.
- 4ad047a6eac3 13.0 landed
-
Doc: revise formatting of function/operator tables.
- 737d69ffc3cf 13.0 landed