Re: ltree_gist indexes broken after pg_upgrade from 12 to 13

Victor Yegorov <vyegorov@gmail.com>

From: Victor Yegorov <vyegorov@gmail.com>
To: Andres Freund <andres@anarazel.de>
Cc: Andrew Dunstan <andrew@dunslane.net>, Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>, Tomas Vondra <tomas.vondra@enterprisedb.com>, Nikita Glukhov <n.gluhov@postgrespro.ru>, PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers@lists.postgresql.org>
Date: 2022-03-06T23:12:07Z
Lists: pgsql-hackers
пн, 7 мар. 2022 г. в 00:34, Andres Freund <andres@anarazel.de>:

> One thing that's likely worth doing as part of the cross version upgrade
> test,
> even if it wouldn't even help in this case, is to run amcheck post
> upgrade. Just dumping data isn't going to touch indices at all.
>
> A sequence of
>   pg_upgrade; amcheck; upgrade all extensions; amcheck;
> would make sense.
>

Is it possible to amcheck gist indexes?..


-- 
Victor Yegorov

Commits

Same data as JSON: GET /api/v1/messages/:b64id/commits the thread's linked commits as JSON, with link sources. API reference →
  1. Fix default signature length for gist_ltree_ops

  2. Implement operator class parameters