Re: ltree_gist indexes broken after pg_upgrade from 12 to 13
Victor Yegorov <vyegorov@gmail.com>
From: Victor Yegorov <vyegorov@gmail.com>
To: Andres Freund <andres@anarazel.de>
Cc: Andrew Dunstan <andrew@dunslane.net>, Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>, Tomas Vondra <tomas.vondra@enterprisedb.com>,
Nikita Glukhov <n.gluhov@postgrespro.ru>, PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers@lists.postgresql.org>
Date: 2022-03-06T23:12:07Z
Lists: pgsql-hackers
пн, 7 мар. 2022 г. в 00:34, Andres Freund <andres@anarazel.de>: > One thing that's likely worth doing as part of the cross version upgrade > test, > even if it wouldn't even help in this case, is to run amcheck post > upgrade. Just dumping data isn't going to touch indices at all. > > A sequence of > pg_upgrade; amcheck; upgrade all extensions; amcheck; > would make sense. > Is it possible to amcheck gist indexes?.. -- Victor Yegorov
Commits
Same data as JSON:
GET /api/v1/messages/:b64id/commits
the thread's linked commits as JSON, with link sources.
API reference →
-
Fix default signature length for gist_ltree_ops
- bad202c615c9 13.7 landed
- 7d30f59da714 14.3 landed
- 7e74aafc4335 15.0 landed
-
Implement operator class parameters
- 911e70207703 13.0 cited