Re: POC: make mxidoff 64 bits

wenhui qiu <qiuwenhuifx@gmail.com>

From: wenhui qiu <qiuwenhuifx@gmail.com>
To: Maxim Orlov <orlovmg@gmail.com>
Cc: Heikki Linnakangas <hlinnaka@iki.fi>, Alexander Korotkov <aekorotkov@gmail.com>, Postgres hackers <pgsql-hackers@lists.postgresql.org>
Date: 2024-10-25T03:38:57Z
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Commits

Same data as JSON: GET /api/v1/messages/:b64id/commits the thread's linked commits as JSON, with link sources. API reference →
  1. Fix partial read handling in pg_upgrade's multixact conversion

  2. Increase timeout in multixid_conversion upgrade test

  3. Improve sanity checks on multixid members length

  4. Clarify comment on multixid offset wraparound check

  5. Never store 0 as the nextMXact

  6. Add runtime checks for bogus multixact offsets

  7. Widen MultiXactOffset to 64 bits

  8. Move pg_multixact SLRU page format definitions to a separate header

  9. Convert confusing macros in multixact.c to static inline functions

  10. Index SLRUs by 64-bit integers rather than by 32-bit integers

  11. Cope with possible failure of the oldest MultiXact to exist.

HI Maxim Orlov
> After a bit of thought, I've realized that to be conservative here is the
way to go.
>We can reuse a maximum of existing logic. I mean, we can remove offset
wraparound "error logic" and reuse "warning logic". But set the threshold
for "warning >logic" to a much higher value. For now, I choose 2^32-1. In
other world, legit logic, in my view, here would be to trigger autovacuum
if the number of offsets (i.e. >difference nextOffset - oldestOffset)
exceeds 2^32-1. PFA patch set.
good point ,Couldn't agree with you more. xid64 is the solution to the
wraparound problem,The previous error log is no longer meaningful ,But we
might want to refine the output waring log a little(For example, checking
the underlying reasons why age has been increasing),Though we don't have to
worry about xid wraparound

+/*
+ * Multixact members warning threshold.
+ *
+ * If difference bettween nextOffset and oldestOffset exceed this value, we
+ * trigger autovacuum in order to release the disk space if possible.
+ */
+#define MULTIXACT_MEMBER_AUTOVAC_THRESHOLD UINT64CONST(0xFFFFFFFF)
Can we refine this annotation a bit? for example
+/*
+ * Multixact members warning threshold.
+ *
+ * If difference bettween nextOffset and oldestOffset exceed this value, we
+ * trigger autovacuum in order to release the disk space ,reduce table
bloat if possible.
+ */
+#define MULTIXACT_MEMBER_AUTOVAC_THRESHOLD UINT64CONST(0xFFFFFFFF)

Thanks

Maxim Orlov <orlovmg@gmail.com> 于2024年10月23日周三 23:55写道:

> After a bit of thought, I've realized that to be conservative here is the
> way to go.
>
> We can reuse a maximum of existing logic. I mean, we can remove offset
> wraparound "error logic" and reuse "warning logic". But set the threshold
> for "warning logic" to a much higher value. For now, I choose 2^32-1. In
> other world, legit logic, in my view, here would be to trigger autovacuum
> if the number of offsets (i.e. difference nextOffset - oldestOffset)
> exceeds 2^32-1. PFA patch set.
>
> --
> Best regards,
> Maxim Orlov.
>