Horton

Re: TOAST versus toast

wenhui qiu <qiuwenhuifx@gmail.com>

View thread
From: wenhui qiu <qiuwenhuifx@gmail.com>
To: "David G. Johnston" <david.g.johnston@gmail.com>
Cc: Peter Smith <smithpb2250@gmail.com>, Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com>, Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>, PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers@lists.postgresql.org>
Date: 2025-04-13T11:37:47Z
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Commits

Same data as JSON: GET /api/v1/messages/:b64id/commits the thread's linked commits as JSON, with link sources. API reference →

  1. doc: TOAST not toast

Hi，
I think this point is of no significance at all. Besides, this is a
document that has been around for over ten years. Everyone has become
accustomed to this kind of expression. This is just a case of being full
but having nothing to do with anything.


On Sat, 12 Apr 2025 at 10:31, David G. Johnston <david.g.johnston@gmail.com>
wrote:

> On Sun, Mar 16, 2025 at 8:33 PM Peter Smith <smithpb2250@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> Thanks for your suggestions. At this point option (1) is looking most
>> attractive. Probably, I will just withdraw the CF entry soon unless
>> there is some new interest. Just chipping away fixing a few places
>> isn't going to achieve the consistency this thread was aiming for.
>>
>>
> I've moved this back to waiting on author pending a final decision.
> Interested parties might still chime in but it doesn't seem like it is
> actively looking for reviewers at this point.
>
> David J.
>
>