Thread

Commits

  1. ci: Add task testing windows with mingw

  1. Mingw task for Cirrus CI

    Melih Mutlu <m.melihmutlu@gmail.com> — 2022-02-25T16:44:27Z

    Hi All,
    
    I've been working on adding Windows+MinGW environment into cirrus-ci tasks
    (discussion about ci is here [1]).
    It uses MSYS2 to set the environment. UCRT is chosen as C standard library,
    instead of MSVCRT.
    The task configures postgres with features that are available in MSYS2 (see
    available packages [2]) and tap tests are enabled.
    I already added the necessary docker image, you can find the related PR at
    [3] and a successful cirruc-ci run with these changes at [4].
    Attached patch adds a task runs on Windows with MinGW for cirrus-ci
    
    However, I cannot run configure with --with-python, --with-perl or
    --with-tcl.
    There are two issues I encountered while trying to enable.  e.g. for
    --with-python
    
    1-  python_ldlibrary is set to "libpython3.9.dll.a". So the related line in
    configure cannot retrieve "ldlibrary"
    2-  src/pl/plpython/Makefile looks under "C:/Windows/system32/" for
    PYTHONDLL. gendef cannot open that file, give an error like " failed to
    open()" when creating a .def file.
    
    To overcome those, I added the correct pattern to extract ldlibrary by
    appending  "-e 's/\.dll.a$//'" at the end of the related line.
    Then, I tried to use python dll from MSYS instead of windows/system32 by
    changing PYTHONDLL path to "/ucrt64/bin/libpython3.9.dll". I'm not sure if
    this is the correct dll.
    Here is the diff of these two changes:
    
    diff --git a/configure b/configure
    index f3cb5c2b51..42ea580442 100755
    --- a/configure
    +++ b/configure
    @@ -10536,7 +10536,7 @@ python_libdir=`${PYTHON} -c "import sysconfig;
    print(' '.join(filter(None,syscon
     python_ldlibrary=`${PYTHON} -c "import sysconfig; print('
    '.join(filter(None,sysconfig.get_config_vars('LDLIBRARY'))))"`
    
     # If LDLIBRARY exists and has a shlib extension, use it verbatim.
    -ldlibrary=`echo "${python_ldlibrary}" | sed -e 's/\.so$//' -e 's/\.dll$//'
    -e 's/\.dylib$//' -e 's/\.sl$//'`
    +ldlibrary=`echo "${python_ldlibrary}" | sed -e 's/\.so$//' -e 's/\.dll$//'
    -e 's/\.dylib$//' -e 's/\.sl$//' -e 's/\.dll.a$//'`
     if test -e "${python_libdir}/${python_ldlibrary}" -a
    x"${python_ldlibrary}" != x"${ldlibrary}"
     then
            ldlibrary=`echo "${ldlibrary}" | sed "s/^lib//"`
    diff --git a/src/pl/plpython/Makefile b/src/pl/plpython/Makefile
    index a83ae8865c..4254ef94d7 100644
    --- a/src/pl/plpython/Makefile
    +++ b/src/pl/plpython/Makefile
    @@ -61,7 +61,8 @@ INCS =        plpython.h \
     ifeq ($(PORTNAME), win32)
    
     pytverstr=$(subst .,,${python_version})
    -PYTHONDLL=$(subst \,/,$(WINDIR))/system32/python${pytverstr}.dll
    +#PYTHONDLL=$(subst \,/,$(WINDIR))/system32/python${pytverstr}.dll
    +PYTHONDLL=/ucrt64/bin/libpython3.9.dll
    
     OBJS += libpython${pytverstr}.a
    
    
    
    In the end, make check-world still fails, even though I was able to run
    configure and make without any obvious error.
    I see bunch of errors in tests like:
    +ERROR:  language "plpython3u" does not exist
    +HINT:  Use CREATE EXTENSION to load the language into the database.
    
    Here is the logs from failed ci run:
    https://api.cirrus-ci.com/v1/artifact/task/4645682031099904/log/build/src/pl/plpython/regression.diffs
    
    
    Any thoughts on how postgres can be built with --with-python etc. on mingw?
    
    Best,
    Melih
    
    
    [1]
    https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/flat/20211001222752.wrz7erzh4cajvgp6%40alap3.anarazel.de
    <https://nam06.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.postgresql.org%2Fmessage-id%2Fflat%2F20211001222752.wrz7erzh4cajvgp6%2540alap3.anarazel.de&data=04%7C01%7CMelih.Mutlu%40microsoft.com%7C7f4780e35ab34e2f38d808d9f7d008e0%7C72f988bf86f141af91ab2d7cd011db47%7C1%7C0%7C637813295184245763%7CUnknown%7CTWFpbGZsb3d8eyJWIjoiMC4wLjAwMDAiLCJQIjoiV2luMzIiLCJBTiI6Ik1haWwiLCJXVCI6Mn0%3D%7C3000&sdata=HkjuBWcQzmiyIyoCuIfKCzAEF9ME6SpGOYjBJMFhQvw%3D&reserved=0>
    [2] https://packages.msys2.org/package/
    <https://nam06.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fpackages.msys2.org%2Fpackage%2F&data=04%7C01%7CMelih.Mutlu%40microsoft.com%7C7f4780e35ab34e2f38d808d9f7d008e0%7C72f988bf86f141af91ab2d7cd011db47%7C1%7C0%7C637813295184245763%7CUnknown%7CTWFpbGZsb3d8eyJWIjoiMC4wLjAwMDAiLCJQIjoiV2luMzIiLCJBTiI6Ik1haWwiLCJXVCI6Mn0%3D%7C3000&sdata=VqfdnrxHv15FUGFXgnNaMli5n2R1tnPPglGq4xWqND0%3D&reserved=0>
    [3] https://github.com/anarazel/pg-vm-images/pull/8
    <https://nam06.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fgithub.com%2Fanarazel%2Fpg-vm-images%2Fpull%2F8&data=04%7C01%7CMelih.Mutlu%40microsoft.com%7C7f4780e35ab34e2f38d808d9f7d008e0%7C72f988bf86f141af91ab2d7cd011db47%7C1%7C0%7C637813295184245763%7CUnknown%7CTWFpbGZsb3d8eyJWIjoiMC4wLjAwMDAiLCJQIjoiV2luMzIiLCJBTiI6Ik1haWwiLCJXVCI6Mn0%3D%7C3000&sdata=IASIgPhLd0%2Fvh1VSn9EC%2BCsH42riE%2Bt6gQPObOb0QmI%3D&reserved=0>
    [4] https://cirrus-ci.com/build/4999469182746624
    <https://nam06.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fcirrus-ci.com%2Fbuild%2F5013577319841792&data=04%7C01%7CMelih.Mutlu%40microsoft.com%7C7f4780e35ab34e2f38d808d9f7d008e0%7C72f988bf86f141af91ab2d7cd011db47%7C1%7C0%7C637813295184245763%7CUnknown%7CTWFpbGZsb3d8eyJWIjoiMC4wLjAwMDAiLCJQIjoiV2luMzIiLCJBTiI6Ik1haWwiLCJXVCI6Mn0%3D%7C3000&sdata=hMGCtgm1uVBWzFHXPEl%2FiaavzWbEqxAuhmKjFcjH%2BF0%3D&reserved=0>
    
  2. Re: Mingw task for Cirrus CI

    Andres Freund <andres@anarazel.de> — 2022-02-26T00:27:46Z

    Hi,
    
    Andrew, CCIng you both because you might be interested in the CI bit, and
    because you might know the answer.
    
    On 2022-02-25 19:44:27 +0300, Melih Mutlu wrote:
    > I've been working on adding Windows+MinGW environment into cirrus-ci tasks
    > (discussion about ci is here [1]).
    > It uses MSYS2 to set the environment. UCRT is chosen as C standard library,
    > instead of MSVCRT.
    > The task configures postgres with features that are available in MSYS2 (see
    > available packages [2]) and tap tests are enabled.
    > I already added the necessary docker image, you can find the related PR at
    > [3] and a successful cirruc-ci run with these changes at [4].
    > Attached patch adds a task runs on Windows with MinGW for cirrus-ci
    >
    > However, I cannot run configure with --with-python, --with-perl or
    > --with-tcl.
    > There are two issues I encountered while trying to enable.  e.g. for
    > --with-python
    >
    > 1-  python_ldlibrary is set to "libpython3.9.dll.a". So the related line in
    > configure cannot retrieve "ldlibrary"
    
    This presumably is due to using mingw's python rather than python.org's
    python. Seems like a reasonable thing to support for the mingw build.
    
    Melih, you could try to build against the python.org python (i installed in
    the CI container).
    
    
    > 2-  src/pl/plpython/Makefile looks under "C:/Windows/system32/" for
    > PYTHONDLL. gendef cannot open that file, give an error like " failed to
    > open()" when creating a .def file.
    
    On my win10 VM in which I installed python.org python I don't see a python dll
    in c:/windows/system32 either. Looks like none of our windows mingw animals
    build with python. So it might just be bitrot.
    
    
    > In the end, make check-world still fails, even though I was able to run
    > configure and make without any obvious error.
    > I see bunch of errors in tests like:
    > +ERROR:  language "plpython3u" does not exist
    > +HINT:  Use CREATE EXTENSION to load the language into the database.
    
    > Here is the logs from failed ci run:
    > https://api.cirrus-ci.com/v1/artifact/task/4645682031099904/log/build/src/pl/plpython/regression.diffs
    
    The URL to the rest of the CI run is https://cirrus-ci.com/task/4645682031099904
    
    
    The relevant failure is earlier:
    
    +ERROR:  could not load library "C:/cirrus/build/tmp_install/ucrt64/lib/postgresql/plpython3.dll": The specified module could not be found.
    
    Clearly plpython is being built, because we see some warnings:
    
    [22:44:24.456] C:/msys64/ucrt64/include/python3.9/pyconfig.h:1474: warning: "SIZEOF_OFF_T" redefined
    [22:44:24.456]  1474 | #define SIZEOF_OFF_T 8
    [22:44:24.456]       |
    [22:44:24.456] In file included from c:/cirrus/src/include/c.h:54,
    [22:44:24.456]                  from c:/cirrus/src/include/postgres.h:46,
    [22:44:24.456]                  from c:/cirrus/contrib/jsonb_plpython/jsonb_plpython.c:1:
    [22:44:24.456] ../../src/include/pg_config.h:875: note: this is the location of the previous definition
    [22:44:24.456]   875 | #define SIZEOF_OFF_T 4
    
    Seems we're doing something wrong and end up with a 4 byte off_t, whereas
    python ends up with an 8byte one. We probably need to fix that. But it's not
    the cause of this problem.
    
    
    You could take out -s from the make flags and see whether plpython3.dll is
    being built and installed, and where to.
    
    
    Greetings,
    
    Andres Freund
    
    
    
    
  3. Re: Mingw task for Cirrus CI

    Andrew Dunstan <andrew@dunslane.net> — 2022-02-26T16:10:45Z

    On 2/25/22 19:27, Andres Freund wrote:
    > Hi,
    >
    > Andrew, CCIng you both because you might be interested in the CI bit, and
    > because you might know the answer.
    >
    >
    >
    >> 2-  src/pl/plpython/Makefile looks under "C:/Windows/system32/" for
    >> PYTHONDLL. gendef cannot open that file, give an error like " failed to
    >> open()" when creating a .def file.
    > On my win10 VM in which I installed python.org python I don't see a python dll
    > in c:/windows/system32 either. Looks like none of our windows mingw animals
    > build with python. So it might just be bitrot.
    
    
    
    There certainly was a time when python from python.org used to install
    its DLL in the system32 directory, so I imagine that's why it's there.
    I'm very glad to see that's no longer the case.
    
    
    cheers
    
    
    andrew
    
    --
    Andrew Dunstan
    EDB: https://www.enterprisedb.com
    
    
    
    
    
  4. Re: Mingw task for Cirrus CI

    Melih Mutlu <m.melihmutlu@gmail.com> — 2022-03-03T10:16:15Z

    Hi Andres,
    
    
    > This presumably is due to using mingw's python rather than python.org's
    > python. Seems like a reasonable thing to support for the mingw build.
    >
    > Melih, you could try to build against the python.org python (i installed
    > in
    > the CI container).
    >
    
    I tried to use the installed python from python.org in the container.
    The problem with this is that "LIBDIR" and "LDLIBRARY" configs of python
    for windows from python.org are empty. Therefore python_libdir or other
    related variables in configure file are not set correctly.
    
    
    Seems we're doing something wrong and end up with a 4 byte off_t, whereas
    > python ends up with an 8byte one. We probably need to fix that. But it's
    > not
    > the cause of this problem.
    >
    >
    > You could take out -s from the make flags and see whether plpython3.dll is
    > being built and installed, and where to.
    >
    
    Here is a run without -s: https://cirrus-ci.com/task/4569363104661504
    I couldn't get what's wrong from these logs to be honest. But I see that
    plpython3.dll exists under src/pl/plpython after build when I run these
    steps locally.
    
    Best,
    Melih
    
  5. Re: Mingw task for Cirrus CI

    Andrew Dunstan <andrew@dunslane.net> — 2022-03-03T12:52:27Z

    On 3/3/22 05:16, Melih Mutlu wrote:
    > Hi Andres, 
    >  
    >
    >     This presumably is due to using mingw's python rather than
    >     python.org <http://python.org>'s
    >     python. Seems like a reasonable thing to support for the mingw build.
    >
    >     Melih, you could try to build against the python.org
    >     <http://python.org> python (i installed in
    >     the CI container).
    >
    >
    > I tried to use the installed python from python.org
    > <http://python.org> in the container. 
    > The problem with this is that "LIBDIR" and "LDLIBRARY" configs of
    > python for windows from python.org <http://python.org> are empty.
    > Therefore python_libdir or other related variables in configure file
    > are not set correctly.
    
    
    
    Yeah, here's what it has:
    
    
    # python -c "import sysconfig; import pprint; pp =
    pprint.PrettyPrinter(); pp.pprint(sysconfig.get_config_vars())"
    {'BINDIR': 'C:\\prog\\python310',
     'BINLIBDEST': 'C:\\prog\\python310\\Lib',
     'EXE': '.exe',
     'EXT_SUFFIX': '.cp310-win_amd64.pyd',
     'INCLUDEPY': 'C:\\prog\\python310\\Include',
     'LIBDEST': 'C:\\prog\\python310\\Lib',
     'SO': '.cp310-win_amd64.pyd',
     'TZPATH': '',
     'VERSION': '310',
     'abiflags': '',
     'base': 'C:\\prog\\python310',
     'exec_prefix': 'C:\\prog\\python310',
     'installed_base': 'C:\\prog\\python310',
     'installed_platbase': 'C:\\prog\\python310',
     'platbase': 'C:\\prog\\python310',
     'platlibdir': 'lib',
     'prefix': 'C:\\prog\\python310',
     'projectbase': 'C:\\prog\\python310',
     'py_version': '3.10.2',
     'py_version_nodot': '310',
     'py_version_nodot_plat': '310',
     'py_version_short': '3.10',
     'srcdir': 'C:\\prog\\python310',
     'userbase': 'C:\\Users\\Administrator\\AppData\\Roaming\\Python'}
    
    
    The DLL lives in the BINDIR, so maybe I guess we should search there if
    we can't get the other things.
    
    
    cheers
    
    
    andrew
    
    --
    Andrew Dunstan
    EDB: https://www.enterprisedb.com
    
    
    
    
    
  6. Re: Mingw task for Cirrus CI

    Andres Freund <andres@anarazel.de> — 2022-03-22T00:15:59Z

    Hi,
    
    On 2022-02-25 19:44:27 +0300, Melih Mutlu wrote:
    > I've been working on adding Windows+MinGW environment into cirrus-ci tasks
    > (discussion about ci is here [1]).
    
    This doesn't apply anymore: http://cfbot.cputube.org/patch_37_3575.log
    
    Could you rebase?
    
    Greetings,
    
    Andres Freund
    
    
    
    
  7. Re: Mingw task for Cirrus CI

    Melih Mutlu <m.melihmutlu@gmail.com> — 2022-03-22T16:00:42Z

    Hi Andres,
    
    Rebased it.
    I also removed the temp installation task and
    used NoDefaultCurrentDirectoryInExePath env variable instead.
    
    Best,
    Melih
    
  8. Re: Mingw task for Cirrus CI

    Andres Freund <andres@anarazel.de> — 2022-03-31T00:26:18Z

    Hi,
    
    On 2022-03-22 19:00:42 +0300, Melih Mutlu wrote:
    > Rebased it.
    > I also removed the temp installation task and
    > used NoDefaultCurrentDirectoryInExePath env variable instead.
    
    Hm. But you're still using a separate build directory, from what I can see?
    The NoDefaultCurrentDirectoryInExePath thing should only have an effect when
    not using a separate build directory, no?
    
    Does it work to not use the separate build dir? Without it we don't need the
    the "preparing build tree" step, and that's quite slow on mingw:
    https://cirrus-ci.com/task/4713509253545984?logs=configure#L392
    
    [00:23:44.371] preparing build tree... done
    [00:24:25.429] configure: creating ./config.status
    
    
    Chatting about this patch with Thomas I started to wonder about other reasons
    for the slow speed of configure. I briefly experimented locally, and it looks
    like using 'dash' as the shell makes configure run a good bit quicker.
    
    
    > ---
    >  .cirrus.yml | 79 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++----------
    >  1 file changed, 65 insertions(+), 14 deletions(-)
    > 
    > diff --git a/.cirrus.yml b/.cirrus.yml
    > index e5335fede7..1ed40347cf 100644
    > --- a/.cirrus.yml
    > +++ b/.cirrus.yml
    > @@ -23,7 +23,6 @@ env:
    >    CHECKFLAGS: -Otarget
    >    PROVE_FLAGS: --timer
    >    PGCTLTIMEOUT: 120 # avoids spurious failures during parallel tests
    > -  TEMP_CONFIG: ${CIRRUS_WORKING_DIR}/src/tools/ci/pg_ci_base.conf
    >    PG_TEST_EXTRA: kerberos ldap ssl
    
    This removes TEMP_CONFIG from all other tasks.  You added it back to the VS
    windows task, but not the others? I assume that was accidental?
    
    
    > +  env:
    > +    CCACHE_DIR: C:/msys64/ccache
    > +    BUILD_DIR: "%CIRRUS_WORKING_DIR%/build"
    
    I think this should use TEMP_CONFIG too. Is the problem that you need to
    change the path?
    
    
    > +  ccache_cache:
    > +    folder: ${CCACHE_DIR}
    > +
    > +  mingw_info_script:
    > +    - C:\msys64\usr\bin\bash.exe -lc "where gcc"
    > +    - C:\msys64\usr\bin\bash.exe -lc "gcc --version"
    > +    - C:\msys64\usr\bin\bash.exe -lc "where perl"
    > +    - C:\msys64\usr\bin\bash.exe -lc "perl --version"
    > +
    > +  configure_script:
    > +    - C:\msys64\usr\bin\bash.exe -lc "mkdir %BUILD_DIR% &&
    > +      cd %BUILD_DIR% &&
    > +      %CIRRUS_WORKING_DIR%/configure
    
    Could you try using dash to invoke configure here, and whether it makes configure faster?
    
    
    > +        --host=x86_64-w64-mingw32
    > +        --enable-cassert
    > +        --enable-tap-tests
    > +        --with-icu
    > +        --with-libxml
    > +        --with-libxslt
    > +        --with-lz4
    > +        --enable-debug
    > +        CC='ccache gcc'
    > +        CXX='ccache g++'"
    
    I think this task should specify CFLAGS="-Og", CXXFLAGS="-Og" similar to other
    tasks. We end up with -O2 otherwise, which makes the build measurably slower.
    
    
    
    > +  tests_script:
    > +  - set "NoDefaultCurrentDirectoryInExePath=0"
    
    A comment about why NoDefaultCurrentDirectoryInExePath=0 is used would be
    good.
    
    
    Greetings,
    
    Andres Freund
    
    
    
    
  9. Re: Mingw task for Cirrus CI

    Andres Freund <andres@anarazel.de> — 2022-04-04T20:41:31Z

    Hi,
    
    On 2022-03-30 17:26:18 -0700, Andres Freund wrote:
    > Hi,
    >
    > On 2022-03-22 19:00:42 +0300, Melih Mutlu wrote:
    > > Rebased it.
    > > I also removed the temp installation task and
    > > used NoDefaultCurrentDirectoryInExePath env variable instead.
    >
    > Hm. But you're still using a separate build directory, from what I can see?
    > The NoDefaultCurrentDirectoryInExePath thing should only have an effect when
    > not using a separate build directory, no?
    
    Melih chatted with me about making this work. Turns out it doesn't readily -
    pg_ctl still fails.
    
    
    The reason that NoDefaultCurrentDirectoryInExePath doesn't suffice to get a
    working in-tree build, is that we break it ourselves:
    
    int
    find_my_exec(const char *argv0, char *retpath)
    ...
    #ifdef WIN32
    	/* Win32 checks the current directory first for names without slashes */
    	join_path_components(retpath, cwd, argv0);
    	if (validate_exec(retpath) == 0)
    		return resolve_symlinks(retpath);
    #endif
    
    So even if windows doesn't actually use the current path, and the current
    pg_ctl process isn't the one from the current directory, we *still* return
    that.
    
    Gah.
    
    
    Maybe we should just use GetModuleFileName()?
    
    
    But even after that the tests don't work. Commands started via IPC::Run do,
    but when using system() they don't. Looks like perl parses the path the itself
    :(.
    
    - Andres
    
    
    
    
  10. Re: Mingw task for Cirrus CI

    Andrew Dunstan <andrew@dunslane.net> — 2022-04-05T14:16:36Z

    On 4/4/22 16:41, Andres Freund wrote:
    > Hi,
    >
    > On 2022-03-30 17:26:18 -0700, Andres Freund wrote:
    >> Hi,
    >>
    >> On 2022-03-22 19:00:42 +0300, Melih Mutlu wrote:
    >>> Rebased it.
    >>> I also removed the temp installation task and
    >>> used NoDefaultCurrentDirectoryInExePath env variable instead.
    >> Hm. But you're still using a separate build directory, from what I can see?
    >> The NoDefaultCurrentDirectoryInExePath thing should only have an effect when
    >> not using a separate build directory, no?
    > Melih chatted with me about making this work. Turns out it doesn't readily -
    > pg_ctl still fails.
    >
    >
    > The reason that NoDefaultCurrentDirectoryInExePath doesn't suffice to get a
    > working in-tree build, is that we break it ourselves:
    >
    > int
    > find_my_exec(const char *argv0, char *retpath)
    > ...
    > #ifdef WIN32
    > 	/* Win32 checks the current directory first for names without slashes */
    > 	join_path_components(retpath, cwd, argv0);
    > 	if (validate_exec(retpath) == 0)
    > 		return resolve_symlinks(retpath);
    > #endif
    >
    > So even if windows doesn't actually use the current path, and the current
    > pg_ctl process isn't the one from the current directory, we *still* return
    > that.
    >
    > Gah.
    
    
    
    
    I notice a few things about the latest file in this thread.
    
    You should set MSYSTEM=UCRT64 in the environment section. Given that,
    there should be no need to specify a --host= setting for configure.
    
    If it's not done already, the shebang line in
    /ucrt64/bin/core_perl/prove needs to be modified to use /ucrt64/bin/perl.
    
    
    cheers
    
    
    andrew
    
    
    --
    Andrew Dunstan
    EDB: https://www.enterprisedb.com
    
    
    
    
    
  11. Re: Mingw task for Cirrus CI

    Andrew Dunstan <andrew@dunslane.net> — 2022-04-06T15:03:37Z

    On 3/30/22 20:26, Andres Freund wrote:
    > Could you try using dash to invoke configure here, and whether it makes configure faster?
    >
    >
    
    
    I got weird failures re libxml/parser.h when I tried with dash. See
    <https://cirrus-ci.com/task/5963254039052288> (It would be nice if we
    could see config.log on failure.)
    
    
    cheers
    
    
    andrew
    
    
    --
    Andrew Dunstan
    EDB: https://www.enterprisedb.com
    
    
    
    
    
  12. Re: Mingw task for Cirrus CI

    Andres Freund <andres@anarazel.de> — 2022-04-06T16:34:19Z

    Hi,
    
    On 2022-04-06 11:03:37 -0400, Andrew Dunstan wrote:
    > On 3/30/22 20:26, Andres Freund wrote:
    > > Could you try using dash to invoke configure here, and whether it makes configure faster?
    > I got weird failures re libxml/parser.h when I tried with dash.
    
    Hm. Hadn't enabled that when I tried...
    
    
    > See <https://cirrus-ci.com/task/5963254039052288> (It would be nice if we
    > could see config.log on failure.)
    
    All *.log files are preserved on failure. There's a file directory brower at
    the top to navigate around:
    https://api.cirrus-ci.com/v1/artifact/task/5963254039052288/log/build/config.log
    
    Greetings,
    
    Andres Freund
    
    
    
    
  13. Re: Mingw task for Cirrus CI

    Andres Freund <andres@anarazel.de> — 2022-04-07T17:10:21Z

    Hi,
    
    On 2022-04-06 11:03:37 -0400, Andrew Dunstan wrote:
    > On 3/30/22 20:26, Andres Freund wrote:
    > > Could you try using dash to invoke configure here, and whether it makes configure faster?
    > I got weird failures re libxml/parser.h when I tried with dash. See
    > <https://cirrus-ci.com/task/5963254039052288> (It would be nice if we
    > could see config.log on failure.)
    
    Since dash won't help us to get the build time down sufficiently, and the
    tests don't pass without a separate build tree, I looked at what makes
    config/prep_buildtree so slow.
    
    It's largely just bad code. The slowest part are spawning one expr and mkdir
    -p for each directory. One 'cmp' for each makefile doesn't help either.
    
    The expr can be replaced with
      subdir=${item#$sourcetree}
    that's afaics posix syntax ([1]), not bash.
    
    Spawning one mkdir for each directory can be replaced by a single mkdir
    invocation with all the directories. On my linux workstation that gets the
    time for the first loop down from 1005ms to 38ms, really.
    
    That has the danger of the commandline getting too long. But since we rely on
    the final link of the backend to be done in a single command, I don't think
    it's making things worse? We could try to use xargs otherwise, iirc that's in
    posix as well.
    
    Using parameter substitution in the second loop takes it down from 775ms to
    533ms. Not calling cmp when the file doesn't exist cuts it down to 337ms.
    
    I don't know of a way to batch the call to ln. The time with ln replaced with
    : is 151ms, fwiw.
    
    On windows that makes prep_buildtree go from 42.4s to 5.8s for me.
    
    Greetings,
    
    Andres Freund
    
    [1] https://pubs.opengroup.org/onlinepubs/009604499/utilities/xcu_chap02.html
    
  14. Re: Mingw task for Cirrus CI

    Andrew Dunstan <andrew@dunslane.net> — 2022-04-07T19:42:13Z

    On 4/6/22 12:34, Andres Freund wrote:
    > Hi,
    >
    > On 2022-04-06 11:03:37 -0400, Andrew Dunstan wrote:
    >> On 3/30/22 20:26, Andres Freund wrote:
    >>> Could you try using dash to invoke configure here, and whether it makes configure faster?
    >> I got weird failures re libxml/parser.h when I tried with dash.
    > Hm. Hadn't enabled that when I tried...
    >
    >
    >> See <https://cirrus-ci.com/task/5963254039052288> (It would be nice if we
    >> could see config.log on failure.)
    > All *.log files are preserved on failure. There's a file directory brower at
    > the top to navigate around:
    > https://api.cirrus-ci.com/v1/artifact/task/5963254039052288/log/build/config.log
    
    
    
    Thanks.
    
    
    I got it working with this added to the config settings:
    
    
    --with-includes='/ucrt64/include/libxml2 /c/cirrus/src/include/port/win32'
    
    
    I conclude tentatively that while bash translates widows paths to msys
    paths, dash does not.
    
    
    see https://cirrus-ci.com/task/5968968560148480?logs=configure#L1
    
    
    cheers
    
    
    andrew
    
    
    --
    Andrew Dunstan
    EDB: https://www.enterprisedb.com
    
    
    
    
    
  15. Re: Mingw task for Cirrus CI

    Andrew Dunstan <andrew@dunslane.net> — 2022-04-07T20:48:50Z

    On 4/7/22 13:10, Andres Freund wrote:
    > Hi,
    >
    > On 2022-04-06 11:03:37 -0400, Andrew Dunstan wrote:
    >> On 3/30/22 20:26, Andres Freund wrote:
    >>> Could you try using dash to invoke configure here, and whether it makes configure faster?
    >> I got weird failures re libxml/parser.h when I tried with dash. See
    >> <https://cirrus-ci.com/task/5963254039052288> (It would be nice if we
    >> could see config.log on failure.)
    > Since dash won't help us to get the build time down sufficiently, and the
    > tests don't pass without a separate build tree, I looked at what makes
    > config/prep_buildtree so slow.
    >
    > It's largely just bad code. The slowest part are spawning one expr and mkdir
    > -p for each directory. One 'cmp' for each makefile doesn't help either.
    >
    > The expr can be replaced with
    >   subdir=${item#$sourcetree}
    > that's afaics posix syntax ([1]), not bash.
    >
    > Spawning one mkdir for each directory can be replaced by a single mkdir
    > invocation with all the directories. On my linux workstation that gets the
    > time for the first loop down from 1005ms to 38ms, really.
    >
    > That has the danger of the commandline getting too long. But since we rely on
    > the final link of the backend to be done in a single command, I don't think
    > it's making things worse? We could try to use xargs otherwise, iirc that's in
    > posix as well.
    >
    > Using parameter substitution in the second loop takes it down from 775ms to
    > 533ms. Not calling cmp when the file doesn't exist cuts it down to 337ms.
    >
    > I don't know of a way to batch the call to ln. The time with ln replaced with
    > : is 151ms, fwiw.
    
    
    AFAIK Msy2s 'ln -s' by default copies a non-directory rather than
    actually symlinking it. If we want real symlinks, then we need
    MSYS=|winsymlinks:nativestrict set. The is will fail unless the calling
    user is an Administrator or has the SeCreateSymbolicLink privilege. See
    |
    
    |<https://postgr.es/m/|e05b213c-1257-84d4-f079-5c4d8c79e3ad@dunslane.net>
    for more details.
    
    
    > On windows that makes prep_buildtree go from 42.4s to 5.8s for me.
    
    
    That's pretty good.
    
    
    I think we can get rid of the CVS pruning, it's only 15 years or so
    since we've had that in the tree.
    
    
    +        if test ! -d "$buildtree/$subdir"; then
    +            echo "$buildtree/$subdir"
    +        fi
    
    
    I would probably just write that as
    
    
    test -d "$buildtree/$subdir' || echo "$buildtree/$subdir"
    
    
    although it's really just a matter of taste.
    
    
    cheers
    
    
    andrew
    
    
    --
    Andrew Dunstan
    EDB: https://www.enterprisedb.com
    
    
    
    
    
  16. Re: Mingw task for Cirrus CI

    Andrew Dunstan <andrew@dunslane.net> — 2022-04-07T20:52:26Z

    On 4/7/22 16:48, Andrew Dunstan wrote:
    > On 4/7/22 13:10, Andres Freund wrote:
    >> Hi,
    >>
    >> On 2022-04-06 11:03:37 -0400, Andrew Dunstan wrote:
    >>> On 3/30/22 20:26, Andres Freund wrote:
    >>>> Could you try using dash to invoke configure here, and whether it makes configure faster?
    >>> I got weird failures re libxml/parser.h when I tried with dash. See
    >>> <https://cirrus-ci.com/task/5963254039052288> (It would be nice if we
    >>> could see config.log on failure.)
    >> Since dash won't help us to get the build time down sufficiently, and the
    >> tests don't pass without a separate build tree, I looked at what makes
    >> config/prep_buildtree so slow.
    >>
    >> It's largely just bad code. The slowest part are spawning one expr and mkdir
    >> -p for each directory. One 'cmp' for each makefile doesn't help either.
    >>
    >> The expr can be replaced with
    >>   subdir=${item#$sourcetree}
    >> that's afaics posix syntax ([1]), not bash.
    >>
    >> Spawning one mkdir for each directory can be replaced by a single mkdir
    >> invocation with all the directories. On my linux workstation that gets the
    >> time for the first loop down from 1005ms to 38ms, really.
    >>
    >> That has the danger of the commandline getting too long. But since we rely on
    >> the final link of the backend to be done in a single command, I don't think
    >> it's making things worse? We could try to use xargs otherwise, iirc that's in
    >> posix as well.
    >>
    >> Using parameter substitution in the second loop takes it down from 775ms to
    >> 533ms. Not calling cmp when the file doesn't exist cuts it down to 337ms.
    >>
    >> I don't know of a way to batch the call to ln. The time with ln replaced with
    >> : is 151ms, fwiw.
    >
    > AFAIK Msy2s 'ln -s' by default copies a non-directory rather than
    > actually symlinking it. If we want real symlinks, then we need
    > MSYS=|winsymlinks:nativestrict set. The is will fail unless the calling
    > user is an Administrator or has the SeCreateSymbolicLink privilege. See
    > |
    
    
    Sometimes I hate Thunderbird. Of course the | is spurious above, we
    would need
    
    MSYS=winsymlinks:nativestrict
    
    set.
    
    
    cheers
    
    andrew
    
    
    --
    Andrew Dunstan
    EDB: https://www.enterprisedb.com
    
    
    
    
    
  17. Re: Mingw task for Cirrus CI

    Melih Mutlu <m.melihmutlu@gmail.com> — 2022-04-08T14:57:21Z

    Hi Andrew,
    
    You should set MSYSTEM=UCRT64 in the environment section. Given that,
    > there should be no need to specify a --host= setting for configure.
    >
    
    It's set to UCRT64 in the docker image side [1]. I didn't know --host isn't
    necessary on UCRT64 environment. I'll remove it then.
    
     [1]
     https://github.com/anarazel/pg-vm-images/blob/main/docker/windows_ci_mingw64#L11
    <https://github.com/anarazel/pg-vm-images/blob/main/docker/windows_ci_mingw64#L11>
    
    Best,
    Melih
    
  18. Re: Mingw task for Cirrus CI

    Alvaro Herrera <alvherre@alvh.no-ip.org> — 2022-04-08T15:04:34Z

    On 2022-Apr-07, Andres Freund wrote:
    
    > Since dash won't help us to get the build time down sufficiently, and the
    > tests don't pass without a separate build tree, I looked at what makes
    > config/prep_buildtree so slow.
    
    Maybe we can replace prep_buildtree with a Perl script.  Surely that
    should be faster.
    
    -- 
    Álvaro Herrera        Breisgau, Deutschland  —  https://www.EnterpriseDB.com/
    "Sallah, I said NO camels! That's FIVE camels; can't you count?"
    (Indiana Jones)
    
    
    
    
  19. Re: Mingw task for Cirrus CI

    Melih Mutlu <m.melihmutlu@gmail.com> — 2022-04-08T15:18:34Z

    > On windows that makes prep_buildtree go from 42.4s to 5.8s for me.
    >
    
    I applied Andres's faster prep build tree changes and triggered some cirrus
    runs
    
    Without these changes, preparing build tree was taking around 42.3s
    (sometimes even more) [1]
    It seems like with these changes it drops to around 8s [2]
    
    [1] https://cirrus-ci.com/task/6562493345562624
    [2] https://cirrus-ci.com/task/4836843802853376
    
    Best,
    Melih
    
  20. Re: Mingw task for Cirrus CI

    Andres Freund <andres@anarazel.de> — 2022-04-08T22:05:57Z

    Hi,
    
    On 2022-04-08 17:04:34 +0200, Alvaro Herrera wrote:
    > > Since dash won't help us to get the build time down sufficiently, and the
    > > tests don't pass without a separate build tree, I looked at what makes
    > > config/prep_buildtree so slow.
    >
    > Maybe we can replace prep_buildtree with a Perl script.  Surely that
    > should be faster.
    
    Currently building doesn't depend on perl :(
    
    I think the improvements that I suggested are big enough that they're worth
    doing on their own, particularly for windows, but also other OSs.
    
    
    I just realized that the second find is pretty expensive compared to the
    first.
    
    time find "$sourcetree" -type d \( \( -name CVS -prune \) -o \( -name .git -prune \) -o -print \) | grep -v "$sourcetree/doc/src/sgml/\+" > /dev/null
    real	0m0.019s
    user	0m0.008s
    sys	0m0.017s
    
    second:
    time find "$sourcetree" -name Makefile -print -o -name GNUmakefile -print | grep -v "$sourcetree/doc/src/sgml/images/" > /dev/null
    
    real	0m0.118s
    user	0m0.071s
    sys	0m0.053s
    
    It think we could just obsolete the second find, by checking for the existence
    of Makefile / GNUmakefile in the first loop...
    
    
    The invocation of ln -s is quite measurable - looks like it's mostly the
    process startup overhead (on linux, at least). Doing a ln --version > /dev/null
    each iteration takes about the same time as actually creating the symlinks.
    
    Greetings,
    
    Andres Freund
    
    
    
    
  21. Re: Mingw task for Cirrus CI

    Justin Pryzby <pryzby@telsasoft.com> — 2022-04-09T00:27:58Z

    On Thu, Apr 07, 2022 at 10:10:21AM -0700, Andres Freund wrote:
    > Hi,
    > 
    > On 2022-04-06 11:03:37 -0400, Andrew Dunstan wrote:
    > > On 3/30/22 20:26, Andres Freund wrote:
    > > > Could you try using dash to invoke configure here, and whether it makes configure faster?
    > > I got weird failures re libxml/parser.h when I tried with dash. See
    > > <https://cirrus-ci.com/task/5963254039052288> (It would be nice if we
    > > could see config.log on failure.)
    > 
    > Since dash won't help us to get the build time down sufficiently, and the
    > tests don't pass without a separate build tree, I looked at what makes
    > config/prep_buildtree so slow.
    > 
    > It's largely just bad code. The slowest part are spawning one expr and mkdir
    > -p for each directory. One 'cmp' for each makefile doesn't help either.
    > 
    > The expr can be replaced with
    >   subdir=${item#$sourcetree}
    > that's afaics posix syntax ([1]), not bash.
    > 
    > Spawning one mkdir for each directory can be replaced by a single mkdir
    > invocation with all the directories. On my linux workstation that gets the
    > time for the first loop down from 1005ms to 38ms, really.
    
    Even better?
    
    (cd "$sourcetree" && find . -print |grep -E '/Makefile$|/GNUmakefile$' |grep -v "$sourcetree/doc/src/sgml/images/" |xargs tar c) |
            (cd "$buildtree" && tar x)
    
    
    
    
  22. Re: Mingw task for Cirrus CI

    Andres Freund <andres@anarazel.de> — 2022-04-09T01:02:41Z

    Hi,
    
    On 2022-04-08 19:27:58 -0500, Justin Pryzby wrote:
    > On Thu, Apr 07, 2022 at 10:10:21AM -0700, Andres Freund wrote:
    > > On 2022-04-06 11:03:37 -0400, Andrew Dunstan wrote:
    > > > On 3/30/22 20:26, Andres Freund wrote:
    > > > > Could you try using dash to invoke configure here, and whether it makes configure faster?
    > > > I got weird failures re libxml/parser.h when I tried with dash. See
    > > > <https://cirrus-ci.com/task/5963254039052288> (It would be nice if we
    > > > could see config.log on failure.)
    > > 
    > > Since dash won't help us to get the build time down sufficiently, and the
    > > tests don't pass without a separate build tree, I looked at what makes
    > > config/prep_buildtree so slow.
    > > 
    > > It's largely just bad code. The slowest part are spawning one expr and mkdir
    > > -p for each directory. One 'cmp' for each makefile doesn't help either.
    > > 
    > > The expr can be replaced with
    > >   subdir=${item#$sourcetree}
    > > that's afaics posix syntax ([1]), not bash.
    > > 
    > > Spawning one mkdir for each directory can be replaced by a single mkdir
    > > invocation with all the directories. On my linux workstation that gets the
    > > time for the first loop down from 1005ms to 38ms, really.
    > 
    > Even better?
    > 
    > (cd "$sourcetree" && find . -print |grep -E '/Makefile$|/GNUmakefile$' |grep -v "$sourcetree/doc/src/sgml/images/" |xargs tar c) |
    >         (cd "$buildtree" && tar x)
    
    Don't think we depend on tar for building, at the moment. But yes, it'd be
    faster... Tar is certainly a smaller dependency than perl, not sure if there's
    any relevant platform without it?
    
    Greetings,
    
    Andres Freund
    
    
    
    
  23. Re: Mingw task for Cirrus CI

    Alvaro Herrera <alvherre@alvh.no-ip.org> — 2022-04-09T10:37:05Z

    On 2022-Apr-08, Andres Freund wrote:
    
    > I just realized that the second find is pretty expensive compared to the
    > first.
    > 
    > time find "$sourcetree" -type d \( \( -name CVS -prune \) -o \( -name .git -prune \) -o -print \) | grep -v "$sourcetree/doc/src/sgml/\+" > /dev/null
    > real	0m0.019s
    > user	0m0.008s
    > sys	0m0.017s
    > 
    > second:
    > time find "$sourcetree" -name Makefile -print -o -name GNUmakefile -print | grep -v "$sourcetree/doc/src/sgml/images/" > /dev/null
    > 
    > real	0m0.118s
    > user	0m0.071s
    > sys	0m0.053s
    
    Hmm, ISTM that time can be reduced a bit with -prune,
    
    time find "$sourcetree"  \( -name .git -prune \) -o -name Makefile -print -o -name GNUmakefile -print | grep -v "$sourcetree/doc/src/sgml/images/" > /dev/null
    
    I thought it might work to do away with the grep and use find's -path
    instead to prune that subdir, but "time" shows almost no difference for
    me:
    
    time find "$sourcetree"  \( -name .git -prune \) -o \( -path '*doc/src/sgml/images' -prune \) -o -name Makefile -print -o -name GNUmakefile -print > /dev/null
    
    Maybe find's -path is equally expensive.  Still, that seems a good
    change anyway.  (The times are lower in my system than those you show.)
    
    > It think we could just obsolete the second find, by checking for the existence
    > of Makefile / GNUmakefile in the first loop...
    
    Hmm, if that's going to require one more shell command per dir, it
    sounds more expensive. It's worth trying, I guess.
    
    > The invocation of ln -s is quite measurable - looks like it's mostly the
    > process startup overhead (on linux, at least). Doing a ln --version > /dev/null
    > each iteration takes about the same time as actually creating the symlinks.
    
    Is this running with some locale settings enabled?  Maybe we can save
    some time by making sure we're under LC_ALL=C or something like that, to
    avoid searching for translation files.
    
    -- 
    Álvaro Herrera         PostgreSQL Developer  —  https://www.EnterpriseDB.com/
    "Las navajas y los monos deben estar siempre distantes"   (Germán Poo)
    
    
    
    
  24. Re: Mingw task for Cirrus CI

    Andrew Dunstan <andrew@dunslane.net> — 2022-04-09T16:34:40Z

    On 4/8/22 21:02, Andres Freund wrote:
    > Hi,
    >
    > On 2022-04-08 19:27:58 -0500, Justin Pryzby wrote:
    >> On Thu, Apr 07, 2022 at 10:10:21AM -0700, Andres Freund wrote:
    >>> On 2022-04-06 11:03:37 -0400, Andrew Dunstan wrote:
    >>>> On 3/30/22 20:26, Andres Freund wrote:
    >>>>> Could you try using dash to invoke configure here, and whether it makes configure faster?
    >>>> I got weird failures re libxml/parser.h when I tried with dash. See
    >>>> <https://cirrus-ci.com/task/5963254039052288> (It would be nice if we
    >>>> could see config.log on failure.)
    >>> Since dash won't help us to get the build time down sufficiently, and the
    >>> tests don't pass without a separate build tree, I looked at what makes
    >>> config/prep_buildtree so slow.
    >>>
    >>> It's largely just bad code. The slowest part are spawning one expr and mkdir
    >>> -p for each directory. One 'cmp' for each makefile doesn't help either.
    >>>
    >>> The expr can be replaced with
    >>>   subdir=${item#$sourcetree}
    >>> that's afaics posix syntax ([1]), not bash.
    >>>
    >>> Spawning one mkdir for each directory can be replaced by a single mkdir
    >>> invocation with all the directories. On my linux workstation that gets the
    >>> time for the first loop down from 1005ms to 38ms, really.
    >> Even better?
    >>
    >> (cd "$sourcetree" && find . -print |grep -E '/Makefile$|/GNUmakefile$' |grep -v "$sourcetree/doc/src/sgml/images/" |xargs tar c) |
    >>         (cd "$buildtree" && tar x)
    > Don't think we depend on tar for building, at the moment. But yes, it'd be
    > faster... Tar is certainly a smaller dependency than perl, not sure if there's
    > any relevant platform without it?
    >
    >
    
    
    Couple of things here.
    
    
    1. The second grep should lose "$sourcetree" I think.
    
    2. Isn't this going to be a change in behaviour in that it will copy
    rather than symlinking the Makefiles? That is in fact the default
    behaviour of msys2's 'ln -s', as I pointed out upthread, but I don't
    think it's what we really want, especially in the general case. If you
    modify the Makefile and you're using a vpath you want to see the change
    reflected in your vpath.
    
    
    cheers
    
    
    andrew
    
    --
    Andrew Dunstan
    EDB: https://www.enterprisedb.com
    
    
    
    
    
  25. Re: Mingw task for Cirrus CI

    Melih Mutlu <m.melihmutlu@gmail.com> — 2022-07-28T14:11:25Z

    Hi hackers,
    
    I'm sharing the rebased version of this patch, if you're still interested.
    
    I would appreciate any feedback or concerns.
    
    Best,
    Melih
    
    
    Andrew Dunstan <andrew@dunslane.net>, 9 Nis 2022 Cmt, 19:34 tarihinde şunu
    yazdı:
    
    >
    > On 4/8/22 21:02, Andres Freund wrote:
    > > Hi,
    > >
    > > On 2022-04-08 19:27:58 -0500, Justin Pryzby wrote:
    > >> On Thu, Apr 07, 2022 at 10:10:21AM -0700, Andres Freund wrote:
    > >>> On 2022-04-06 11:03:37 -0400, Andrew Dunstan wrote:
    > >>>> On 3/30/22 20:26, Andres Freund wrote:
    > >>>>> Could you try using dash to invoke configure here, and whether it
    > makes configure faster?
    > >>>> I got weird failures re libxml/parser.h when I tried with dash. See
    > >>>> <https://cirrus-ci.com/task/5963254039052288> (It would be nice if we
    > >>>> could see config.log on failure.)
    > >>> Since dash won't help us to get the build time down sufficiently, and
    > the
    > >>> tests don't pass without a separate build tree, I looked at what makes
    > >>> config/prep_buildtree so slow.
    > >>>
    > >>> It's largely just bad code. The slowest part are spawning one expr and
    > mkdir
    > >>> -p for each directory. One 'cmp' for each makefile doesn't help either.
    > >>>
    > >>> The expr can be replaced with
    > >>>   subdir=${item#$sourcetree}
    > >>> that's afaics posix syntax ([1]), not bash.
    > >>>
    > >>> Spawning one mkdir for each directory can be replaced by a single mkdir
    > >>> invocation with all the directories. On my linux workstation that gets
    > the
    > >>> time for the first loop down from 1005ms to 38ms, really.
    > >> Even better?
    > >>
    > >> (cd "$sourcetree" && find . -print |grep -E '/Makefile$|/GNUmakefile$'
    > |grep -v "$sourcetree/doc/src/sgml/images/" |xargs tar c) |
    > >>         (cd "$buildtree" && tar x)
    > > Don't think we depend on tar for building, at the moment. But yes, it'd
    > be
    > > faster... Tar is certainly a smaller dependency than perl, not sure if
    > there's
    > > any relevant platform without it?
    > >
    > >
    >
    >
    > Couple of things here.
    >
    >
    > 1. The second grep should lose "$sourcetree" I think.
    >
    > 2. Isn't this going to be a change in behaviour in that it will copy
    > rather than symlinking the Makefiles? That is in fact the default
    > behaviour of msys2's 'ln -s', as I pointed out upthread, but I don't
    > think it's what we really want, especially in the general case. If you
    > modify the Makefile and you're using a vpath you want to see the change
    > reflected in your vpath.
    >
    >
    > cheers
    >
    >
    > andrew
    >
    > --
    > Andrew Dunstan
    > EDB: https://www.enterprisedb.com
    >
    >
    
  26. Re: Mingw task for Cirrus CI

    Justin Pryzby <pryzby@telsasoft.com> — 2022-07-28T22:44:28Z

    I think the "only_if" should allow separately running one but not both of the
    windows instances, like:
    
    +  only_if: $CIRRUS_CHANGE_MESSAGE !=~ '.*\nci-os-only:.*' || $CIRRUS_CHANGE_MESSAGE =~ '.*\nci-os-only:[^\n]*mingw64'
    
    I'm not sure, but maybe this task should only run "by request", and omit the
    first condition:
    
    +  only_if: $CIRRUS_CHANGE_MESSAGE =~ '.*\nci-os-only:[^\n]*mingw64'
    
    I think it should include something like
    
    +  setup_additional_packages_script: |
    +    REM C:\msys64\usr\bin\pacman.exe -S --noconfirm ...
    
    Let's see what others think about those.
    
    Do you know if this handles logging of crash dumps ?
    
    With tweaks to prep_buildtree, and with ./configure --cache-file, that step
    goes down to ~36sec (unless configure needs to be re-run).
    
    I also looked into using busybox to avoid running separate processes for each
    "ln", but I think 36sec is good enough.
    
    At one point, I tried setting "CIRRUS_SHELL: bash" to avoid writing "bash -c"
    over and over, but never got it working.
    
    -- 
    Justin
    
  27. Re: Mingw task for Cirrus CI

    Thomas Munro <thomas.munro@gmail.com> — 2022-08-04T02:04:33Z

    I noticed that this says:
    
    [01:01:45.657] sqlda.pgc: In function 'dump_sqlda':
    [01:01:45.657] sqlda.pgc:45:33: warning: format '%d' expects argument
    of type 'int', but argument 3 has type 'long long int' [-Wformat=]
    [01:01:45.657] 45 | "name sqlda descriptor: '%s' value %I64d\n",
    [01:01:45.657] | ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
    [01:01:45.657] ......
    [01:01:45.657] 49 | sqlda->sqlvar[i].sqlname.data, *(long long int
    *)sqlda->sqlvar[i].sqldata);
    [01:01:45.657] | ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
    [01:01:45.657] | |
    [01:01:45.657] | long long int
    
    ... but fairywren doesn't.  Why would they disagree on recognising %I64d?
    
    The other warning I'm seeing is present on both, so it's not really
    relevant to this thread, just mentioning it...  seems kinda like a
    worlds-colliding-problem without an elegant fix (POSIX says you have
    to declare it yourself exactly like that, but Windows says linkage
    ain't going to work the way you want unless you sprinkle the right
    linkage dust on it...), so maybe we just want to put #if
    !defined(something something mings) around it and to MinGW's header's
    declaration...
    
    [00:48:08.925] c:/cirrus/src/backend/postmaster/postmaster.c: In
    function 'PostmasterMain':
    [00:48:08.925] c:/cirrus/src/backend/postmaster/postmaster.c:973:31:
    warning: '__p__environ' redeclared without dllimport attribute:
    previous dllimport ignored [-Wattributes]
    [00:48:08.925] 973 | extern char **environ;
    [00:48:08.925] | ^~~~~~~
    
    
    
    
  28. Re: Mingw task for Cirrus CI

    Thomas Munro <thomas.munro@gmail.com> — 2022-08-04T08:38:34Z

    On Thu, Aug 4, 2022 at 2:04 PM Thomas Munro <thomas.munro@gmail.com> wrote:
    > I noticed that this says:
    >
    > [01:01:45.657] sqlda.pgc: In function 'dump_sqlda':
    > [01:01:45.657] sqlda.pgc:45:33: warning: format '%d' expects argument
    > of type 'int', but argument 3 has type 'long long int' [-Wformat=]
    > [01:01:45.657] 45 | "name sqlda descriptor: '%s' value %I64d\n",
    > [01:01:45.657] | ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
    > [01:01:45.657] ......
    > [01:01:45.657] 49 | sqlda->sqlvar[i].sqlname.data, *(long long int
    > *)sqlda->sqlvar[i].sqldata);
    > [01:01:45.657] | ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
    > [01:01:45.657] | |
    > [01:01:45.657] | long long int
    >
    > ... but fairywren doesn't.  Why would they disagree on recognising %I64d?
    
    Oops, I was looking in the wrong place.  fairywren does also shows the warning:
    
    https://buildfarm.postgresql.org/cgi-bin/show_stage_log.pl?nm=fairywren&dt=2022-08-02%2022%3A05%3A30&stg=ecpg-check
    
    Something to fix, but not directly relevant to this patch.  Sorry for the noise.
    
    
    
    
  29. Re: Mingw task for Cirrus CI

    Justin Pryzby <pryzby@telsasoft.com> — 2022-08-19T02:33:56Z

    Inline notes about changes since the last version.
    
    On Thu, Jul 28, 2022 at 05:44:28PM -0500, Justin Pryzby wrote:
    > I think the "only_if" should allow separately running one but not both of the
    > windows instances, like:
    > 
    > +  only_if: $CIRRUS_CHANGE_MESSAGE !=~ '.*\nci-os-only:.*' || $CIRRUS_CHANGE_MESSAGE =~ '.*\nci-os-only:[^\n]*mingw64'
    > 
    > I'm not sure, but maybe this task should only run "by request", and omit the
    > first condition:
    > 
    > +  only_if: $CIRRUS_CHANGE_MESSAGE =~ '.*\nci-os-only:[^\n]*mingw64'
    
    The patch shouldn't say this during development, or else cfbot doesn't run it..
    Oops.
    
    > I think it should include something like
    > 
    > +  setup_additional_packages_script: |
    > +    REM C:\msys64\usr\bin\pacman.exe -S --noconfirm ...
    > 
    > Let's see what others think about those.
    > 
    > Do you know if this handles logging of crash dumps ?
    
    It does now, although I hardcoded "postgres.exe" ...
    
    > +  setup_additional_packages_script: |
    > +    REM C:\msys64\usr\bin\pacman.exe -S --noconfirm busybox
    
    This should include choco, too.
    
    > -        CXXFLAGS='-Og -ggdb'"
    > +        CXXFLAGS='-Og -ggdb' && break;
    > +        rm -v ${CCACHE_DIR}/configure.cache;
    > +        done
    
    I noticed that this doesn't seem to do the right thing with the exit status -
    configure can fail without cirrusci noticing, and then the build fails at the
    next step.
    
    >  for item in `find "$sourcetree" -name Makefile -print -o -name GNUmakefile -print | grep -v "$sourcetree/doc/src/sgml/images/"`; do
    > -    filename=`expr "$item" : "$sourcetree\(.*\)"`
    > -    if test ! -f "${item}.in"; then
    > -        if cmp "$item" "$buildtree/$filename" >/dev/null 2>&1; then : ; else
    > -            ln -fs "$item" "$buildtree/$filename" || exit 1
    > -        fi
    > -    fi
    > +    filename=${item#$sourcetree}
    > +    [ -e "$buildtree/$filename" ] && continue
    
    I fixed this to check for ".in" files as intended.
    
    It'd be a lot better if the image didn't take so long to start. :(
    
    -- 
    Justin
    
  30. Re: Mingw task for Cirrus CI

    Melih Mutlu <m.melihmutlu@gmail.com> — 2022-09-02T21:52:54Z

    Justin Pryzby <pryzby@telsasoft.com>, 19 Ağu 2022 Cum, 05:34 tarihinde şunu
    yazdı:
    
    > Inline notes about changes since the last version.
    >
    > On Thu, Jul 28, 2022 at 05:44:28PM -0500, Justin Pryzby wrote:
    > > I think the "only_if" should allow separately running one but not both
    > of the
    > > windows instances, like:
    > >
    > > +  only_if: $CIRRUS_CHANGE_MESSAGE !=~ '.*\nci-os-only:.*' ||
    > $CIRRUS_CHANGE_MESSAGE =~ '.*\nci-os-only:[^\n]*mingw64'
    > >
    > > I'm not sure, but maybe this task should only run "by request", and omit
    > the
    > > first condition:
    > >
    > > +  only_if: $CIRRUS_CHANGE_MESSAGE =~ '.*\nci-os-only:[^\n]*mingw64'
    >
    > The patch shouldn't say this during development, or else cfbot doesn't run
    > it..
    > Oops.
    >
    Actually, making MinGW task optional for now might make sense. Due to
    windows resource limits on Cirrus CI and slow builds on Windows, adding
    this task as non-optional may not be an efficient decision
    I think that continuing with this patch by changing MinGW to optional for
    now, instead of waiting for more resource on Cirrus or faster builds on
    Windows, could be better. I don't see any harm.
    
    +  only_if: $CIRRUS_CHANGE_MESSAGE =~ '.*\nci-os-include:[^\n]*mingw.* ||
    > $CIRRUS_CHANGE_MESSAGE =~ '.*\nci-os-only:[^\n]*mingw.*'
    
    Added this line to allow run only mingw task or run all tasks including
    mingw.
    
    What do you all think about this change? Does it make sense?
    
    
    Thanks for your contributions/reviews Justin!
    
    > I think it should include something like
    > >
    > > +  setup_additional_packages_script: |
    > > +    REM C:\msys64\usr\bin\pacman.exe -S --noconfirm ...
    > >
    > > Let's see what others think about those.
    > >
    > > Do you know if this handles logging of crash dumps ?
    >
    > It does now, although I hardcoded "postgres.exe" ...
    >
    
    merged this with my patch
    
    > +  setup_additional_packages_script: |
    > > +    REM C:\msys64\usr\bin\pacman.exe -S --noconfirm busybox
    >
    > This should include choco, too.
    
    Added pacman.exe line. Do we really need choco here? I don't think mingw
    would require any package via choco.
    Also is ending pacman.exe line with busybox intentional? I just added that
    line with "..." at the end instead of any package name.
    
    
    >
    >
    > -        CXXFLAGS='-Og -ggdb'"
    > > +        CXXFLAGS='-Og -ggdb' && break;
    > > +        rm -v ${CCACHE_DIR}/configure.cache;
    > > +        done
    >
    > I noticed that this doesn't seem to do the right thing with the exit
    > status -
    > configure can fail without cirrusci noticing, and then the build fails at
    > the
    > next step.
    
    
    merged.
    
    
    >
    >
    >  for item in `find "$sourcetree" -name Makefile -print -o -name
    > GNUmakefile -print | grep -v "$sourcetree/doc/src/sgml/images/"`; do
    > > -    filename=`expr "$item" : "$sourcetree\(.*\)"`
    > > -    if test ! -f "${item}.in"; then
    > > -        if cmp "$item" "$buildtree/$filename" >/dev/null 2>&1; then : ;
    > else
    > > -            ln -fs "$item" "$buildtree/$filename" || exit 1
    > > -        fi
    > > -    fi
    > > +    filename=${item#$sourcetree}
    > > +    [ -e "$buildtree/$filename" ] && continue
    >
    > I fixed this to check for ".in" files as intended.
    >
    > It'd be a lot better if the image didn't take so long to start. :(
    >
    
    One question would be that should this patch include "prep_buildtree"? It
    doesn't seem to me like it's directly related to adding MinGW into CI but
    more like an improvement for builds on Windows.
    Maybe we can make it a seperate patch if it's necessary.
    
    What do you think?
    
     TAR: "c:/windows/system32/tar.exe"
    >
    
    Sharing a new version of the patch. It also moves the above line so that it
    will apply to mingw task too. Otherwise mingw task was failing.
    
    Thanks,
    Melih
    
  31. Re: Mingw task for Cirrus CI

    Justin Pryzby <pryzby@telsasoft.com> — 2022-09-05T11:50:55Z

    On Sat, Sep 03, 2022 at 12:52:54AM +0300, Melih Mutlu wrote:
    > Justin Pryzby <pryzby@telsasoft.com>, 19 Ağu 2022 Cum, 05:34 tarihinde şunu yazdı:
    > 
    > > Inline notes about changes since the last version.
    > >
    > > On Thu, Jul 28, 2022 at 05:44:28PM -0500, Justin Pryzby wrote:
    > > > I think the "only_if" should allow separately running one but not both
    > > of the
    > > > windows instances, like:
    > > >
    > > > +  only_if: $CIRRUS_CHANGE_MESSAGE !=~ '.*\nci-os-only:.*' || $CIRRUS_CHANGE_MESSAGE =~ '.*\nci-os-only:[^\n]*mingw64'
    > > >
    > > > I'm not sure, but maybe this task should only run "by request", and omit the
    > > > first condition:
    > > >
    > > > +  only_if: $CIRRUS_CHANGE_MESSAGE =~ '.*\nci-os-only:[^\n]*mingw64'
    > >
    > > The patch shouldn't say this during development, or else cfbot doesn't run it..
    > > Oops.
    >
    > Actually, making MinGW task optional for now might make sense. Due to
    > windows resource limits on Cirrus CI and slow builds on Windows, adding
    > this task as non-optional may not be an efficient decision
    > I think that continuing with this patch by changing MinGW to optional for
    > now, instead of waiting for more resource on Cirrus or faster builds on
    > Windows, could be better. I don't see any harm.
    
    I agree that maybe it should be optional if merged to postgres.
    
    But cfbot should run the Mingw task for this patch's own commitfest
    entry.  But right now (because cfbot doesn't include the original commit
    message/s), it doesn't get run :(
    
    > +  only_if: $CIRRUS_CHANGE_MESSAGE =~ '.*\nci-os-include:[^\n]*mingw.* ||
    >             $CIRRUS_CHANGE_MESSAGE =~ '.*\nci-os-only:[^\n]*mingw.*'
    > 
    > Added this line to allow run only mingw task or run all tasks including
    > mingw.
    > 
    > What do you all think about this change? Does it make sense?
    
    You're allowing to write "ci-os-include: mingw" to "opt-in" to the task,
    without opting-out of all the other tasks (and without enumerating all
    the tasks by writing "ci-os-only: mingw,windows,macos,freebsd,linux".
    That makes sense, and the logic looks right.  But that still has to be
    commented during development to be run by cfbot.
    
    Also, the first half was missing a closing quote.
    https://cirrus-ci.com/build/5874178241855488
    
    > > +  setup_additional_packages_script: |
    > > > +    REM C:\msys64\usr\bin\pacman.exe -S --noconfirm busybox
    > >
    > > This should include choco, too.
    > 
    > Added pacman.exe line. Do we really need choco here? I don't think mingw
    > would require any package via choco.
    
    I guess choco isn't needed.
    
    > Also is ending pacman.exe line with busybox intentional? I just added that
    > line with "..." at the end instead of any package name.
    
    Yeah, the busybox part was unintentional.
    
    > > >  for item in `find "$sourcetree" -name Makefile -print -o -name GNUmakefile -print | grep -v "$sourcetree/doc/src/sgml/images/"`; do
    > > > -    filename=`expr "$item" : "$sourcetree\(.*\)"`
    > > > -    if test ! -f "${item}.in"; then
    > > > -        if cmp "$item" "$buildtree/$filename" >/dev/null 2>&1; then : ; else
    > > > -            ln -fs "$item" "$buildtree/$filename" || exit 1
    > > > -        fi
    > > > -    fi
    > > > +    filename=${item#$sourcetree}
    > > > +    [ -e "$buildtree/$filename" ] && continue
    > >
    > > I fixed this to check for ".in" files as intended.
    > >
    > > It'd be a lot better if the image didn't take so long to start. :(
    > 
    > One question would be that should this patch include "prep_buildtree"? It
    > doesn't seem to me like it's directly related to adding MinGW into CI but
    > more like an improvement for builds on Windows.
    > Maybe we can make it a seperate patch if it's necessary.
    
    I don't know what direction that idea is going, but it makes working
    with this patch a bit easier when configure is less slow.  Fine with me
    to split it into a separate patch :)
    
    > Sharing a new version of the patch. It also moves the above line so that it
    > will apply to mingw task too. Otherwise mingw task was failing.
    
    I saw that but hadn't tracked it down yet.  Do you know if the tar
    failures were from a TAP test added since you first posted the mingw
    patch, or ??
    
    Also: your original patch said --host=x86_64-w64-mingw32, but the task
    is called MinGW64.  The most recent patches don't use --host at all, and
    were building for a 32 bit environment, even though the OS image says
    MSYSTEM=UCRT64.
    
    Also: right now src/test and src/interfaces/*/test aren't being built
    during the build phase, which means that they're 1) not compiled in
    parallel; and 2) not cached.  This isn't specific to MinGW.  Other than
    compiling those dirs specifically, one option is to put
    "always: upload_caches: ccache" after "test_world_script" (in that case,
    if the CI instance is rescheduled during tests, the compilation won't be
    pushed to cache).  Actually, it seems better to compile stuff during
    "build" or else any compilation warnings should up in the middle of
    "check-world.."
    
    Also: I'm having second thoughts about the loop around ./configure.  It
    could happen that a cached configure would succeed, but then the build
    would later fail, and it wouldn't fix itself.  I think a slow configure
    is okay for an "opt-in" task.
    
    Also: my backtrace call was using a path to cygwin rather than msys.
    This seemed to work before, but doesn't seem to be working now...
    
    -- 
    Justin
    
  32. Re: Mingw task for Cirrus CI

    Andres Freund <andres@anarazel.de> — 2022-09-05T23:52:17Z

    Hi,
    
    On 2022-09-05 06:50:55 -0500, Justin Pryzby wrote:
    > I saw that but hadn't tracked it down yet.  Do you know if the tar
    > failures were from a TAP test added since you first posted the mingw
    > patch, or ??
    
    I think it's that msys now includes tar by default, but not sure.
    
    
    > Also: your original patch said --host=x86_64-w64-mingw32, but the task
    > is called MinGW64.  The most recent patches don't use --host at all, and
    > were building for a 32 bit environment, even though the OS image says
    > MSYSTEM=UCRT64.
    
    I don't think you should need to use --host, that indicates cross compiling,
    which we shouldn't do. I don't think the patch without --host targets 32bit -
    the last time CI ran the patch, it built a 64bit PG:
    
    https://cirrus-ci.com/task/5489471041830912?logs=configure#L231
    [13:47:54.539] checking size of void *... (cached) 8
    [13:47:54.557] checking size of size_t... (cached) 8
    
    and the underlying commit didn't specify --host.
    
    
    > Also: right now src/test and src/interfaces/*/test aren't being built
    > during the build phase, which means that they're 1) not compiled in
    > parallel; and 2) not cached.  This isn't specific to MinGW.  Other than
    > compiling those dirs specifically, one option is to put
    > "always: upload_caches: ccache" after "test_world_script" (in that case,
    > if the CI instance is rescheduled during tests, the compilation won't be
    > pushed to cache).  Actually, it seems better to compile stuff during
    > "build" or else any compilation warnings should up in the middle of
    > "check-world.."
    
    I'd tackle that independently of this commit.
    
    
    > Also: I'm having second thoughts about the loop around ./configure.  It
    > could happen that a cached configure would succeed, but then the build
    > would later fail, and it wouldn't fix itself.  I think a slow configure
    > is okay for an "opt-in" task.
    
    Agreed.
    
    I think we can convert this to meson soon, and that seems a *lot* faster at
    configure than autoconf on mingw. Not even close to as fast as on a modern-ish
    linux, but not that painful.
    
    
    Greetings,
    
    Andres Freund
    
    
    
    
  33. Re: Mingw task for Cirrus CI

    Justin Pryzby <pryzby@telsasoft.com> — 2022-09-10T20:19:44Z

    On Mon, Sep 05, 2022 at 04:52:17PM -0700, Andres Freund wrote:
    > I don't think you should need to use --host, that indicates cross compiling,
    
    This made me consider the idea of cross-compiling for windows under a
    new linux task, and then running tests under Windows with a dependent
    task.  I suppose that use -Og, in addition to CompilerWarnings, which
    uses -O2.
    
    cirrusci caches are (or can be) shared between tasks.  I got this mostly
    working, with a few kludges to compile and install stuff under src/test.
    This may be yet another idea that's obsoleted by meson.  WDYT?
    
    -- 
    Justin
    
    
    
    
  34. Re: Mingw task for Cirrus CI

    Melih Mutlu <m.melihmutlu@gmail.com> — 2022-09-21T13:18:43Z

    Hi hackers,
    
    Justin Pryzby <pryzby@telsasoft.com>, 5 Eyl 2022 Pzt, 14:50 tarihinde şunu
    yazdı:
    
    > But cfbot should run the Mingw task for this patch's own commitfest
    > entry.  But right now (because cfbot doesn't include the original commit
    > message/s), it doesn't get run :(
    >
    
    I've been thinking about how to make the mingw task run only for this patch
    on cfbot and not for others. TBH, I couldn't come up with a nice way to
    achieve this.
    
    Does anyone have any suggestions on this?
    
    Andres Freund <andres@anarazel.de>, 6 Eyl 2022 Sal, 02:52 tarihinde şunu
    yazdı:
    
    > Hi,
    >
    > On 2022-09-05 06:50:55 -0500, Justin Pryzby wrote:
    > > I saw that but hadn't tracked it down yet.  Do you know if the tar
    > > failures were from a TAP test added since you first posted the mingw
    > > patch, or ??
    >
    > I think it's that msys now includes tar by default, but not sure.
    
    
    Seems like msys2 comes with GNU tar now. Previously it was bsd tar under
    "/c/Windows/System32/tar.exe " which now we force it to use.
    
    
    Thanks,
    Melih
    
  35. Re: Mingw task for Cirrus CI

    Andres Freund <andres@anarazel.de> — 2022-09-21T14:04:45Z

    Hi,
    
    On 2022-09-21 16:18:43 +0300, Melih Mutlu wrote:
    > I've been thinking about how to make the mingw task run only for this patch
    > on cfbot and not for others. TBH, I couldn't come up with a nice way to
    > achieve this.
    > 
    > Does anyone have any suggestions on this?
    
    Add a commented-out trigger-type: manual and note in the commit message that
    the committer needs to adjust that piece.
    
    Greetings,
    
    Andres Freund
    
    
    
    
  36. Re: Mingw task for Cirrus CI

    Andres Freund <andres@anarazel.de> — 2022-09-22T17:03:05Z

    Hi Melih,
    
    On 2022-09-05 16:52:17 -0700, Andres Freund wrote:
    > I think we can convert this to meson soon, and that seems a *lot* faster at
    > configure than autoconf on mingw. Not even close to as fast as on a modern-ish
    > linux, but not that painful.
    
    Now that meson has been merged, could you try to adjust this patch so it
    builds with meson?
    
    Regards,
    
    Andres
    
    
    
    
  37. Re: Mingw task for Cirrus CI

    Melih Mutlu <m.melihmutlu@gmail.com> — 2022-10-07T17:00:56Z

    Hi hackers.
    
    Andres Freund <andres@anarazel.de>, 22 Eyl 2022 Per, 20:03 tarihinde şunu
    yazdı:
    
    > Now that meson has been merged, could you try to adjust this patch so it
    > builds with meson?
    >
    
    Attached patch is the adjusted version to build with meson.
    
    Add a commented-out trigger-type: manual and note in the commit message that
    > the committer needs to adjust that piece.
    >
    
    Done.
    
    > Also: your original patch said --host=x86_64-w64-mingw32, but the task
    > > is called MinGW64.  The most recent patches don't use --host at all, and
    > > were building for a 32 bit environment, even though the OS image says
    > > MSYSTEM=UCRT64.
    
    
    > I don't think you should need to use --host, that indicates cross
    > compiling,
    > which we shouldn't do. I don't think the patch without --host targets
    > 32bit -
    > the last time CI ran the patch, it built a 64bit PG:
    
    
    Also removed this with meson changes. Can confirm that it builds 64bit.
    
    Justin Pryzby <pryzby@telsasoft.com>, 5 Eyl 2022 Pzt, 14:50 tarihinde şunu
    yazdı:
    
    > I don't know what direction that idea is going, but it makes working
    > with this patch a bit easier when configure is less slow.  Fine with me
    > to split it into a separate patch :)
    
    
    If it's okay, then I would suggest not including that piece into this patch
    since I don't know what direction this is going either.
    
    
    The patch has been changed quite a bit due to meson integration.
    I would appreciate any feedback.
    
    Best,
    Melih
    
  38. Re: Mingw task for Cirrus CI

    Andres Freund <andres@anarazel.de> — 2022-10-11T18:23:36Z

    Hi,
    
    On 2022-10-07 20:00:56 +0300, Melih Mutlu wrote:
    > Attached patch is the adjusted version to build with meson.
    
    Thanks!
    
    
    > diff --git a/.cirrus.yml b/.cirrus.yml
    > index 9f2282471a..7e6ebdf7b7 100644
    > --- a/.cirrus.yml
    > +++ b/.cirrus.yml
    > @@ -35,6 +35,7 @@ on_failure_ac: &on_failure_ac
    >        - "**/*.log"
    >        - "**/*.diffs"
    >        - "**/regress_log_*"
    > +      - "**/*.stackdump"
    >      type: text/plain
    
    
    I think it might be easier to just set MSYS=winjitdebug
    https://www.msys2.org/wiki/JIT-Debugging/#native-windows-processes-started-from-msys2
    and then rely on the existing windows crash reporting stuff.
    
    >    setup_additional_packages_script: |
    >      REM choco install -y --no-progress ...
    > -
    >    # Use /DEBUG:FASTLINK to avoid high memory usage during linking
    >    configure_script: |
    
    You removed a bunch of newlines here and nearby - I assume that wasn't
    intentional?
    
    
    > +  mingw_info_script:
    > +    - C:\msys64\usr\bin\dash.exe -lc "where gcc"
    > +    - C:\msys64\usr\bin\dash.exe -lc "gcc --version"
    > +    - C:\msys64\usr\bin\dash.exe -lc "where perl"
    > +    - C:\msys64\usr\bin\dash.exe -lc "perl --version"
    > +
    > +  configure_script:
    > +    - C:\msys64\usr\bin\dash.exe -lc "cd %CIRRUS_WORKING_DIR% &&
    > +      meson setup --buildtype debug -Dcassert=true -Db_pch=true -DTAR=%TAR% build"
    
    There's no need to use dash anymore, the amount of shell script run is
    minimal.
    
    
    > +  build_script:
    > +    - C:\msys64\usr\bin\dash.exe -lc "cd %CIRRUS_WORKING_DIR% && ninja -C %BUILD_DIR%"
    > +  upload_caches: ccache
    > +
    > +  test_world_script:
    > +    - C:\msys64\usr\bin\dash.exe -lc "cd %CIRRUS_WORKING_DIR% && meson test --print-errorlogs --num-processes %TEST_JOBS% -C %BUILD_DIR%"
    > +
    
    I think the "cd"s here are superfluous given the ninja -C %BUILD_DIR% etc.
    
    Greetings,
    
    Andres Freund
    
    
    
    
  39. Re: Mingw task for Cirrus CI

    Andres Freund <andres@anarazel.de> — 2022-10-11T18:46:12Z

    Hi,
    
    On 2022-10-11 11:23:36 -0700, Andres Freund wrote:
    > > +  build_script:
    > > +    - C:\msys64\usr\bin\dash.exe -lc "cd %CIRRUS_WORKING_DIR% && ninja -C %BUILD_DIR%"
    > > +  upload_caches: ccache
    
    Only remembered that just after sending my email: When using b_pch=true (which
    saves a lot of time on mingw) ccache won't cache much (IIRC just the pch files
    themselves) unless you do something like
    export CCACHE_SLOPPINESS=pch_defines,time_macros
    
    $ ccache -z -C
    Clearing... 100.0% [==============================================================================]
    
    $ ninja clean && ccache -z && CCACHE_SLOPPINESS= time ninja src/bin/pg_test_fsync/pg_test_fsync.exe && ccache -s
    [2/2] Cleaning
    Cleaning... 200 files.
    Statistics zeroed
    [124/124] Linking target src/bin/pg_test_fsync/pg_test_fsync.exe
    0.00user 0.01system 0:07.60elapsed 0%CPU (0avgtext+0avgdata 4936maxresident)k
    0inputs+0outputs (1314major+0minor)pagefaults 0swaps
    Summary:
      Hits:               0 /    1 (0.00 %)
        Direct:           0 /    1 (0.00 %)
        Preprocessed:     0 /    1 (0.00 %)
      Misses:             1
        Direct:           1
        Preprocessed:     1
      Uncacheable:      110
    
    As you can see, most of the files are determined to be unachable. The build
    took 7.6s.
    
    
    $ ninja clean && ccache -z && CCACHE_SLOPPINESS=pch_defines,time_macros time ninja src/bin/pg_test_fsync/pg_test_fsync.exe && ccache -s
    [2/2] Cleaning
    Cleaning... 200 files.
    Statistics zeroed
    [124/124] Linking target src/bin/pg_test_fsync/pg_test_fsync.exe
    0.00user 0.01system 0:09.91elapsed 0%CPU (0avgtext+0avgdata 4936maxresident)k
    0inputs+0outputs (1313major+0minor)pagefaults 0swaps
    Summary:
      Hits:               0 /  111 (0.00 %)
        Direct:           0 /  111 (0.00 %)
        Preprocessed:     0 /  111 (0.00 %)
      Misses:           111
        Direct:         111
        Preprocessed:   111
    Primary storage:
      Hits:               0 /  216 (0.00 %)
      Misses:           216
      Cache size (GB): 0.05 / 5.00 (0.98 %)
    
    Files are cachable, but are cache misses (because we cleaned the cache
    above). The build took 9.91s.
    
    
    $ ninja clean && ccache -z && CCACHE_SLOPPINESS=pch_defines,time_macros time ninja src/bin/pg_test_fsync/pg_test_fsync.exe && ccache -s
    [2/2] Cleaning
    Cleaning... 200 files.
    Statistics zeroed
    [124/124] Linking target src/bin/pg_test_fsync/pg_test_fsync.exe
    0.00user 0.01system 0:02.40elapsed 0%CPU (0avgtext+0avgdata 4936maxresident)k
    0inputs+0outputs (1314major+0minor)pagefaults 0swaps
    Summary:
      Hits:             111 /  111 (100.0 %)
        Direct:         111 /  111 (100.0 %)
        Preprocessed:     0 /    0
      Misses:             0
        Direct:           0
        Preprocessed:     0
    Primary storage:
      Hits:             222 /  222 (100.0 %)
      Misses:             0
      Cache size (GB): 0.05 / 5.00 (0.98 %)
    
    Files are cachable, and hit the cache. The build takes 2.4s.
    
    
    Using ccache's depend mode reduce the cache-miss case to 7.51s and the cache
    hit case to 1.75s. So we should likely export CCACHE_DEPEND=1 as well.
    
    Greetings,
    
    Andres Freund
    
    
    
    
  40. Re: Mingw task for Cirrus CI

    Melih Mutlu <m.melihmutlu@gmail.com> — 2022-10-18T09:49:02Z

    Hi Andres,
    
    Andres Freund <andres@anarazel.de>, 11 Eki 2022 Sal, 21:23 tarihinde şunu
    yazdı:
    
    > I think it might be easier to just set MSYS=winjitdebug
    >
    > https://www.msys2.org/wiki/JIT-Debugging/#native-windows-processes-started-from-msys2
    > and then rely on the existing windows crash reporting stuff.
    >
    
    Done.
    
    
    > You removed a bunch of newlines here and nearby - I assume that wasn't
    > intentional?
    >
    
    Yes, that was my mistake. Thanks for pointing it out. Fixed.
    
    
    > There's no need to use dash anymore, the amount of shell script run is
    > minimal.
    >
    
    Switched back to bash.
    
    
    > I think the "cd"s here are superfluous given the ninja -C %BUILD_DIR% etc.
    >
    
    You're right. Those were needed when it was building with autoconf. Not
    anymore. Removed.
    
    Only remembered that just after sending my email: When using b_pch=true
    > (which
    > saves a lot of time on mingw) ccache won't cache much (IIRC just the pch
    > files
    > themselves) unless you do something like
    > export CCACHE_SLOPPINESS=pch_defines,time_macros
    >
    
    Added  CCACHE_SLOPPINESS and CCACHE_SLOPPINESS variables.
    
    You can find the updated patch attached.
    
    Best,
    Melih
    
  41. Re: Mingw task for Cirrus CI

    Nazir Bilal Yavuz <byavuz81@gmail.com> — 2022-10-18T12:37:32Z

    Hi,
    
    Thanks for the patch!
    
    On 10/18/22 12:49, Melih Mutlu wrote:
    >
    >
    > You can find the updated patch attached.
    >
    
    Does it makes sense to set these at 'Windows - Server 2019, MinGW64 - 
    Meson' task:
    
    env:
         ...
         CHERE_INVOKING: 1
         BASH_EXE: C:\msys64\usr\bin\bash.exe
    
    'CHERE_INVOKING: 1' will cause bash.exe to start from current working 
    directory(%CIRRUS_WORKING_DIR%).
    
    In this way, there is no need for
    'cd %CIRRUS_WORKING_DIR%' when using bash.exe,
    also no need for 'BUILD_DIR' environment variable.
    
    i.e:
    
    configure_script: |
         %BASH_EXE% -lc "meson setup --buildtype debug -Dcassert=true 
    -Db_pch=true -DTAR=%TAR% build"
    
    will work.
    
    Regards,
    Nazir Bilal Yavuz
  42. Re: Mingw task for Cirrus CI

    Melih Mutlu <m.melihmutlu@gmail.com> — 2022-10-18T21:23:46Z

    Hi Bilal,
    
    Nazir Bilal Yavuz <byavuz81@gmail.com>, 18 Eki 2022 Sal, 15:37 tarihinde
    şunu yazdı:
    
    > env:
    >     ...
    >     CHERE_INVOKING: 1
    >     BASH_EXE: C:\msys64\usr\bin\bash.exe
    >
    > 'CHERE_INVOKING: 1' will cause bash.exe to start from current working
    > directory(%CIRRUS_WORKING_DIR%).
    >
    > In this way, there is no need for
    > 'cd %CIRRUS_WORKING_DIR%' when using bash.exe,
    > also no need for 'BUILD_DIR' environment variable.
    >
    
     Right, setting CHERE_INVOKING and removing all cd's work and look better.
    Thanks for the suggestion.
    
    Here's the updated patch.
    
    Best,
    Melih
    
  43. Re: Mingw task for Cirrus CI

    Andres Freund <andres@anarazel.de> — 2022-10-19T03:19:28Z

    Hi,
    
    On 2022-10-19 00:23:46 +0300, Melih Mutlu wrote:
    >  Right, setting CHERE_INVOKING and removing all cd's work and look better.
    > Thanks for the suggestion.
    
    Agreed, good idea.
    
    
    > +
    > +  env:
    > +    CCACHE_DIR: C:/msys64/ccache
    
    It's a bit odd to separate the CCACHE_* variables from each other
    (e.g. BUILD_DIR is inbetween them)...
    
    
    > +    BUILD_DIR: "%CIRRUS_WORKING_DIR%/build"
    > +    PYTHONHOME: C:/msys64/ucrt64
    
    Perhaps add a comment explaining that otherwise plpython tests fail?
    
    
    > +    MSYS: winjitdebug
    
    With this src/tools/ci/cores_backtrace.sh shouldn't need to be modified
    anymore afaict?
    
    
    > +    CCACHE_SLOPPINESS: pch_defines,time_macros
    > +    CCACHE_DEPEND: 1
    
    I experimented a bit and it looks like ccache doesn't yet quite work in CI,
    but only because the ccache needs to be larger. Looks like we need about
    ~400MB.
    
    A fully cached build is ~2min
    
    
    > +  configure_script: |
    > +    %BASH_EXE% -lc "meson setup --buildtype debug -Dcassert=true -Db_pch=true -DTAR=%TAR% build"
    
    With these buildflags the tests take about 23min37s. Using -Og I saw 18min26s,
    with -O1 18m57s and with -O2 18m38s. There's obviously a fair bit of variance,
    but it looks like we should use -Og. I think we considered that making compile
    times too bad before, but it seems kinda ok now, with 11min. -O2 is 13min,
    without providing further benefits.
    
    I'd replace --buildtype debug with -Ddebug=true -Doptimization=g.
    
    
    > +  build_script: |
    > +    %BASH_EXE% -lc "cd %CIRRUS_WORKING_DIR% && ninja -C build"
    >
    Why do we still need this cd?
    
    
    > +  upload_caches: ccache
    > +
    > +  test_world_script: |
    > +    %BASH_EXE% -lc "meson test --print-errorlogs --num-processes %TEST_JOBS% -C build"
    
    Seems like this could use %MTEST_ARGS%?
    
    
    Greetings,
    
    Andres Freund
    
    
    
    
  44. Re: Mingw task for Cirrus CI

    Melih Mutlu <m.melihmutlu@gmail.com> — 2022-10-19T14:59:22Z

    Hi,
    
    Andres Freund <andres@anarazel.de>, 19 Eki 2022 Çar, 06:19 tarihinde şunu
    yazdı:
    
    > It's a bit odd to separate the CCACHE_* variables from each other
    > (e.g. BUILD_DIR is inbetween them)...
    >
    > Perhaps add a comment explaining that otherwise plpython tests fail?
    
    
    >
    With this src/tools/ci/cores_backtrace.sh shouldn't need to be modified
    > anymore afaict?
    >
    > I'd replace --buildtype debug with -Ddebug=true -Doptimization=g.
    >
    
    
    Seems like this could use %MTEST_ARGS%?
    
    
    All the things you mentioned above are done.
    
    
    
    > > +    CCACHE_SLOPPINESS: pch_defines,time_macros
    > > +    CCACHE_DEPEND: 1
    >
    > I experimented a bit and it looks like ccache doesn't yet quite work in CI,
    > but only because the ccache needs to be larger. Looks like we need about
    > ~400MB.
    >
    > A fully cached build is ~2min
    >
    
    Then I should increase CCACHE_MAXSIZE, right? Made it 500MB for MinGW.
    
    Sharing the updated version of the patch.
    
    Thanks,
    Melih
    
  45. Re: Mingw task for Cirrus CI

    Andres Freund <andres@anarazel.de> — 2022-10-19T16:23:28Z

    Hi,
    
    On 2022-10-19 17:59:22 +0300, Melih Mutlu wrote:
    > All the things you mentioned above are done.
    
    > Then I should increase CCACHE_MAXSIZE, right? Made it 500MB for MinGW.
    
    Yes.
    
    > +
    > +  on_failure:
    > +    <<: *on_failure_meson
    > +    cores_script: |
    > +      %BASH_EXE% -lc "cd build src/tools/ci/cores_backtrace.sh msys build/tmp_install"
    > +
    
    This is wrong - it should just archive the same files that the current windows
    task does.
    
    Other than that, I think this is basically ready?
    
    Greetings,
    
    Andres Freund
    
    
    
    
  46. Re: Mingw task for Cirrus CI

    Melih Mutlu <m.melihmutlu@gmail.com> — 2022-10-24T11:13:06Z

    Hi,
    
    
    > > +
    > > +  on_failure:
    > > +    <<: *on_failure_meson
    > > +    cores_script: |
    > > +      %BASH_EXE% -lc "cd build src/tools/ci/cores_backtrace.sh msys
    > build/tmp_install"
    > > +
    >
    > This is wrong - it should just archive the same files that the current
    > windows
    > task does.
    >
    
    Changed it with the on_failure from the other windows task.
    
    
    > Other than that, I think this is basically ready?
    >
    
    If you say so, then I think it's ready.
    
    Best,
    Melih
    
  47. Re: Mingw task for Cirrus CI

    Andres Freund <andres@anarazel.de> — 2022-11-18T00:23:56Z

    Hi,
    
    On 2022-10-24 14:13:06 +0300, Melih Mutlu wrote:
    > If you say so, then I think it's ready.
    
    I pushed it with a few changes:
    
    - I added an only_if, otherwise the task shows up (without running) even if
      you use ci-os-only: linux
    - I added -Dnls=disabled - It seemed to add about 1.5min to the cached build
    - Inlined the -l into BASH_EXE and renamed it to BASH
    - The indentation of WINDOWS_ENVIRONMENT_BASE was irregular, leading to a
      larger diff. Some other similar cleanups.
    - I added 'mingw' as a ci-os-only choice. Perhaps not the
      be-all-end-all. Perhaps we should use windows-{msvc,mingw,cygwin}? Or add
      ci-task-only?
    
    
    I suspect we can make at least -Dssl=openssl work. Perhaps one of the uuid
    implementation is available in msys as well?
    
    Currently we end up with:
       External libraries
         bonjour                : NO
         bsd_auth               : NO
         gss                    : NO
         icu                    : YES 72.1
         ldap                   : YES
         libxml                 : YES 2.10.3
         libxslt                : YES 1.1.37
         llvm                   : NO
         lz4                    : YES 1.9.4
         nls                    : NO
         pam                    : NO
         plperl                 : YES
         plpython               : YES 3.10
         pltcl                  : YES
         readline               : YES
         selinux                : NO
         ssl                    : NO
         systemd                : NO
         uuid                   : NO
         zlib                   : YES 1.2.13
         zstd                   : YES 1.5.2
    
    gss should also work if the is available in the msys repo.
    
    Bonjour is apple only, bsd_auth bsd specific, selinux and systemd linux
    specific and pam unixoid specific.
    
    It could also be interesting to see if llvm works, but that might be more
    work.
    
    Greetings,
    
    Andres Freund