Re: RFC: Allow EXPLAIN to Output Page Fault Information
Jelte Fennema-Nio <postgres@jeltef.nl>
From: Jelte Fennema-Nio <postgres@jeltef.nl>
To: torikoshia <torikoshia@oss.nttdata.com>
Cc: pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org, rjuju123@gmail.com, tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us, Bruce Momjian <bruce@momjian.us>
Date: 2025-02-08T13:54:14Z
Lists: pgsql-hackers
Commits
Same data as JSON:
GET /api/v1/messages/:b64id/commits
the thread's linked commits as JSON, with link sources.
API reference →
-
Avoid leaking system path from pg_available_extensions
- db5ed03217b9 19 (unreleased) cited
-
Enable BUFFERS with EXPLAIN ANALYZE by default
- c2a4078ebad7 18.0 cited
On Mon, 27 Jan 2025 at 10:05, torikoshia <torikoshia@oss.nttdata.com> wrote: > Therefore, I believe it would be reasonable to report the raw values > as-is, as they should still be useful for understanding storage I/O > activity. Sounds reasonable. Below some feedback on the patch. It's all really minor. The patch looks great. I'll play around with it a bit next week. meta: it's confusing that this one is called v1 again, it would be clearer if it was called v2. nit: at line 528 the "if (es->buffers)" check can simply be merged with the if block above (which does the exact same check) > if (usage->inblock <= 0 && usage->outblock <= 0) > return false; > > else > return true; nit: You can replace that if-else with: return usage->inblock > 0 || usage->outblock > 0; > StorageIOUsageAccumDiff(StorageIOUsage *dst, const StorageIOUsage *add, const StorageIOUsage *sub) Missing a function comment