Re: UUID v7
Jelte Fennema-Nio <postgres@jeltef.nl>
From: Jelte Fennema-Nio <postgres@jeltef.nl>
To: Sergey Prokhorenko <sergeyprokhorenko@yahoo.com.au>
Cc: "Andrey M. Borodin" <x4mmm@yandex-team.ru>, Aleksander Alekseev <aleksander@timescale.com>, pgsql-hackers mailing list <pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org>, Peter Eisentraut <peter@eisentraut.org>, Przemysław Sztoch <przemyslaw@sztoch.pl>, "David G. Johnston" <david.g.johnston@gmail.com>, Mat Arye <mat@timescaledb.com>, Matthias van de Meent <boekewurm+postgres@gmail.com>, Nikolay Samokhvalov <samokhvalov@gmail.com>, Junwang Zhao <zhjwpku@gmail.com>
Date: 2024-03-12T17:26:09Z
Lists: pgsql-hackers
On Tue, 12 Mar 2024 at 18:18, Sergey Prokhorenko <sergeyprokhorenko@yahoo.com.au> wrote: > Andrey and you simply did not read the RFC a little further down in the text: You're totally right, sorry about that. Maybe it would be good to move those subsections around a bit in the RFC though, so that anything related to only one method is included in the section for that method.
Commits
-
Fix timestamp overflow in UUIDv7 implementation.
- a5419bc72e22 18.0 landed
-
Add UUID version 7 generation function.
- 78c5e141e9c1 18.0 landed
-
Add some UUID support functions
- 794f10f6b920 17.0 landed