Re: UUID v7

Jelte Fennema-Nio <postgres@jeltef.nl>

From: Jelte Fennema-Nio <postgres@jeltef.nl>
To: Sergey Prokhorenko <sergeyprokhorenko@yahoo.com.au>
Cc: "Andrey M. Borodin" <x4mmm@yandex-team.ru>, Aleksander Alekseev <aleksander@timescale.com>, pgsql-hackers mailing list <pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org>, Peter Eisentraut <peter@eisentraut.org>, Przemysław Sztoch <przemyslaw@sztoch.pl>, "David G. Johnston" <david.g.johnston@gmail.com>, Mat Arye <mat@timescaledb.com>, Matthias van de Meent <boekewurm+postgres@gmail.com>, Nikolay Samokhvalov <samokhvalov@gmail.com>, Junwang Zhao <zhjwpku@gmail.com>
Date: 2024-03-12T17:26:09Z
Lists: pgsql-hackers
On Tue, 12 Mar 2024 at 18:18, Sergey Prokhorenko
<sergeyprokhorenko@yahoo.com.au> wrote:
> Andrey and you simply did not read the RFC a little further down in the text:

You're totally right, sorry about that. Maybe it would be good to move
those subsections around a bit in the RFC though, so that anything
related to only one method is included in the section for that method.



Commits

  1. Fix timestamp overflow in UUIDv7 implementation.

  2. Add UUID version 7 generation function.

  3. Add some UUID support functions