Thread
Commits
-
doc: Improve description of pg_get_multixact_stats()
- 30937c60cd9d 19 (unreleased) landed
-
Fix doc about pg_get_multixact_stats()
Yingying Chen <cyy9255@gmail.com> — 2026-06-25T11:49:58Z
Hi Hacker, I found a small documentation issue in func-info.smgl: <para> The internal transaction ID type <type>xid</type> is 32 bits wide and wraps around every 4 billion transactions. However, the functions shown in <xref linkend="functions-pg-snapshot"/>, except <function>age</function>, <function>mxid_age</function>, and <function>pg_get_multixact_members</function>, use a 64-bit type <type>xid8</type> that does not wrap around during the life of an installation and can be converted to <type>xid</type> by casting if required; see <xref linkend="transaction-id"/> for details. Since pg_get_multixact_stats() was added in PG19, it should be added to this exception list. Regards, Yingying Chen -
Re: Fix doc about pg_get_multixact_stats()
Michael Paquier <michael@paquier.xyz> — 2026-06-25T22:27:03Z
On Thu, Jun 25, 2026 at 07:49:58PM +0800, Yingying Chen wrote: > Since pg_get_multixact_stats() was added in PG19, it should be added to > this exception list. Indeed. Thanks for the patch. Will fix. -- Michael
-
Re: Fix doc about pg_get_multixact_stats()
Chao Li <li.evan.chao@gmail.com> — 2026-06-25T23:15:37Z
> On Jun 26, 2026, at 06:27, Michael Paquier <michael@paquier.xyz> wrote: > > On Thu, Jun 25, 2026 at 07:49:58PM +0800, Yingying Chen wrote: >> Since pg_get_multixact_stats() was added in PG19, it should be added to >> this exception list. > > Indeed. Thanks for the patch. Will fix. > -- > Michael While reviewing this patch, I found this statement for pg_get_multixact_stats() is a little misleading or unclear: ``` <para> To use this function, you must have privileges of the <literal>pg_read_all_stats</literal> role. </para></entry> ``` From the implementation, for unprivileged (not super user and not pg_read_all_stats role) users, pg_get_multixact_stats doesn't raise an error, but just returns all NULL values. The current statement doesn't seem to explain that behavior clearly. How about rephrasing it like this? ``` <para> Only superusers and roles with privileges of the <literal>pg_read_all_stats</literal> role can see details; other users receive null values. </para></entry> ``` Best regards, -- Chao Li (Evan) HighGo Software Co., Ltd. https://www.highgo.com/ -
Re: Fix doc about pg_get_multixact_stats()
Michael Paquier <michael@paquier.xyz> — 2026-06-25T23:41:39Z
On Fri, Jun 26, 2026 at 07:15:37AM +0800, Chao Li wrote: > From the implementation, for unprivileged (not super user and not > pg_read_all_stats role) users, pg_get_multixact_stats doesn't raise > an error, but just returns all NULL values. The current statement > doesn't seem to explain that behavior clearly. > > How about rephrasing it like this? > ``` > <para> > Only superusers and roles with privileges of the > <literal>pg_read_all_stats</literal> role can see details; other users > receive null values. > </para></entry> > ``` Yeah, that looks like an improvement over the statu-quo. I was looking for something similar but we don't have many functions hidden behind a role privilege. -- Michael