Re: [HACKERS] advanced partition matching algorithm for partition-wise join

Ashutosh Bapat <ashutosh.bapat@2ndquadrant.com>

From: Ashutosh Bapat <ashutosh.bapat@2ndquadrant.com>

To: Etsuro Fujita <etsuro.fujita@gmail.com>

Cc: Tomas Vondra <tomas.vondra@2ndquadrant.com>, Ashutosh Bapat <ashutosh.bapat.oss@gmail.com>, Mark Dilger <mark.dilger@enterprisedb.com>, amul sul <sulamul@gmail.com>, Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com>, Thomas Munro <thomas.munro@gmail.com>, Amit Langote <Langote_Amit_f8@lab.ntt.co.jp>, Rajkumar Raghuwanshi <rajkumar.raghuwanshi@enterprisedb.com>, Etsuro Fujita <fujita.etsuro@lab.ntt.co.jp>, Dmitry Dolgov <9erthalion6@gmail.com>, Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org>

Date: 2020-04-06T11:45:34Z

Lists: pgsql-hackers

Commits

Same data as JSON: GET /api/v1/messages/:b64id/commits the thread's linked commits as JSON, with link sources. API reference →

Suppress unused-variable warning.
- 401418ca6a68 13.0 landed
Allow partitionwise joins in more cases.
- c8434d64ce03 13.0 landed
Avoid crash in partitionwise join planning under GEQO.
- 7ad6498fd5a6 12.0 cited
- d70c147fa217 11.3 cited
Disable support for partitionwise joins in problematic cases.
- 7cfdc77023ad 12.0 cited
Add plan_cache_mode setting
- f7cb2842bf47 12.0 cited
Add test for partitionwise join involving default partition.
- 4513d3a4be0b 12.0 cited
Revise API for partition_rbound_cmp/partition_rbound_datum_cmp.
- b0229235564f 11.0 landed

Attachments

changes_over_v34.patch (text/x-patch) patch v34

Here are some changes suggested on top of v34 as per my previous mail.
These are mostly comment changes.

On Mon, 6 Apr 2020 at 13:59, Etsuro Fujita <etsuro.fujita@gmail.com> wrote:

> On Sat, Apr 4, 2020 at 12:15 AM Etsuro Fujita <etsuro.fujita@gmail.com>
> wrote:
> > Attached is the original patch (0001) and one patch (0002) with
> > changes including those by Tomas and Ashutosh.
>
> I merged the patches into one and rebased it against HEAD.  Attached
> is a new version, in which I added the commit message as well.  Does
> that make sense?  If there are no objections, I’ll commit the patch.
>

I have no objections.

-- 
Best Wishes,
Ashutosh