Thread
-
Any way to get nested loop index joins on CTEs?
Clemens Eisserer <linuxhippy@gmail.com> — 2025-07-15T13:29:27Z
Hi, I am using generate_series + a join to group time-series data into buckets, which works well as long as I do this only for one aggregation hierarchy: The index on the timestamp of the table with the actual time-series data is used for a nested loop index join. However with more aggregation levels (one aggregation stage consuming the output of the previous one) chained together using CTEs, there is no index available and postgresql falls back to (no-index) nested loop joins. Example, with the actual access to the data-table replaced, as there is no index it triggers the nested loop join immediatly (despite MATERIALIZED + ORDER BY): WITH series1h AS MATERIALIZED (SELECT generate_series AS ts FROM generate_series('1990-01-01 00:00', '1990-12-31 23:59', INTERVAL '1 hour') ORDER BY ts), series15m AS MATERIALIZED (SELECT generate_series AS ts FROM generate_series('1990-01-01 00:00', '1990-12-31 23:59', INTERVAL '15 minutes') ORDER BY ts) SELECT count(*) FROM (SELECT h1.ts, count(*) FROM series1h h1 JOIN series15m m15 ON (m15.ts > (h1.ts - INTERVAL '1 hour') AND m15.ts <= h1.ts ) GROUP BY h1.ts ORDER BY h1.ts); date_bin would allow to join on equality, however according to the docs it doesn't support months/years: The stride interval must be greater than zero and cannot contain units of month or larger. For now I am using temporary tables which can be indexed, are there ways to avoid them? Thanks, Clemens -
Re: Any way to get nested loop index joins on CTEs?
Jean-Christophe BOGGIO <postgresql@thefreecat.org> — 2025-07-16T11:24:54Z
Following up on this, I very often have to create PLPgSql functions to workaround this problem: create one (or several) temp table(s) (with ON COMMIT DROP), analyze it/them and create indices on some field(s). Being able to write something like: WITH xxx AS MATERIALIZED ANALYZED INDEXED ON field1 ( SELECT DISTINCT myfield AS field1 FROM table1 ) SELECT field2 FROM table2 JOIN xxx USING(field1); would help a lot in some cases. Of course, the syntax is just a thought but the general idea is there.
-
Re: Any way to get nested loop index joins on CTEs?
Renan Alves Fonseca <renanfonseca@gmail.com> — 2025-08-29T16:38:50Z
Hi, it is definitively possible to get nested loop joins on successively aggregated CTEs. However, for the index to be used, it must exist. And you can only create the index on a real table, not on the intermediate CTEs. > WITH series1h AS MATERIALIZED (SELECT generate_series AS ts FROM > generate_series('1990-01-01 00:00', '1990-12-31 23:59', INTERVAL '1 > hour') ORDER BY ts), > series15m AS MATERIALIZED (SELECT generate_series AS ts FROM > generate_series('1990-01-01 00:00', '1990-12-31 23:59', INTERVAL '15 > minutes') ORDER BY ts) > SELECT count(*) FROM (SELECT h1.ts, count(*) FROM series1h h1 JOIN > series15m m15 ON (m15.ts > (h1.ts - INTERVAL '1 hour') AND m15.ts <= > h1.ts ) GROUP BY h1.ts ORDER BY h1.ts); Here is an example based on the query above: CREATE TEMP TABLE series15m AS (SELECT generate_series('1990-01-01 00:00', '1990-12-31 23:59', INTERVAL '15 minutes')::timestamp as ts, random() as your_data ORDER BY 1); CREATE INDEX short_period ON series15m (ts); CREATE INDEX long_period ON series15m (date_trunc('hour',ts)); EXPLAIN (costs 'off') WITH series1h AS (SELECT date_trunc('hour',ts) as ts FROM series15m) SELECT h1.ts, sum(your_data) FROM series1h h1 JOIN series15m m15 ON (m15.ts >(h1.ts - INTERVAL '1 hour') AND m15.ts <= h1.ts ) GROUP BY h1.ts ORDER BY h1.ts ; QUERY PLAN ------------------------------------------------------------------- GroupAggregate Group Key: date_trunc('hour'::text, series15m.ts) -> Nested Loop -> Index Scan using long_period on series15m -> Index Scan using short_period on series15m m15 Index Cond: (...) So, the general idea is to create functional indexes (long_period in this example) on the base table that will cover the aggregate keys of intermediate CTEs. This approach works as long as the aggregate keys depend only on one table. Best regards, Renan Fonseca