Horton

Re: [PATCH] Initial progress reporting for COPY command

Josef Šimánek <josef.simanek@gmail.com>

View thread View on postgr.es
From: Josef Šimánek <josef.simanek@gmail.com>
To: Michael Paquier <michael@paquier.xyz>
Cc: Fujii Masao <masao.fujii@oss.nttdata.com>, Pavel Stehule <pavel.stehule@gmail.com>, Daniel Gustafsson <daniel@yesql.se>, Tomas Vondra <tomas.vondra@2ndquadrant.com>, Pg Hackers <pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org>, vignesh C <vignesh21@gmail.com>
Date: 2020-09-17T15:08:46Z
Lists: pgsql-hackers 
čt 17. 9. 2020 v 7:09 odesílatel Michael Paquier <michael@paquier.xyz> napsal:
>
> On Mon, Sep 07, 2020 at 01:13:10PM +0900, Michael Paquier wrote:
> > Josef, the patch has been waiting on author for a bit more than one
> > month, so could you send a rebased version please?  It looks that you
> > are still a bit confused by the commit fest process, and as a first
> > step we need a clean version to be able to review it.  This would also
> > allow the commit fest bot to check it at http://commitfest.cputube.org/.
>
> This feature has some appeal, but there is no activity lately, so I am
> marking it as returned with feedback.  Please feel free to send a new
> patch once you have time to do so, and I would recommend to register a
> new entry in the commit fest app when done.

Thanks for info. I hope I'll be able to revisit this patch soon,
rebase and post again. I'm still interested in this.

> --
> Michael

Commits

  1. Report progress of COPY commands

  2. Doc fixup for hashagg_avoid_disk_plan GUC.

  3. Fix inconsistent markups in catalogs.sgml