Horton

Re: Partitioning with temp tables is broken

Ashutosh Bapat <ashutosh.bapat@enterprisedb.com>

View thread View on postgr.es
From: Ashutosh Bapat <ashutosh.bapat@enterprisedb.com>
To: Michael Paquier <michael@paquier.xyz>
Cc: Amit Langote <Langote_Amit_f8@lab.ntt.co.jp>, Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>, David Rowley <david.rowley@2ndquadrant.com>, amul sul <sulamul@gmail.com>, PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers@lists.postgresql.org>, Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com>
Date: 2018-06-19T10:56:56Z
Lists: pgsql-hackers 
On Tue, Jun 19, 2018 at 4:22 PM, Michael Paquier <michael@paquier.xyz> wrote:
>
> I was under the impression that this was implied in the precious
> phrasing but you guys visibly don't match with my impression.  So I
> would suggest this paragraph at the end:
> "Mixing temporary and permanent relations in the same partition tree is
> not allowed.  Hence, if the partitioned table is permanent, so must be
> its partitions at all levels and likewise if the partitioned table is

You don't need to mention "at all levels", its implied recursively.

-- 
Best Wishes,
Ashutosh Bapat
EnterpriseDB Corporation
The Postgres Database Company

Commits

  1. Clarify use of temporary tables within partition trees