Re: print_path is missing GatherMerge and CustomScan support
Ashutosh Bapat <ashutosh.bapat@enterprisedb.com>
From: Ashutosh Bapat <ashutosh.bapat@enterprisedb.com>
To: Michael Paquier <michael@paquier.xyz>
Cc: Masahiko Sawada <sawada.mshk@gmail.com>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org>,
Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com>
Date: 2018-07-19T06:36:13Z
Lists: pgsql-hackers
On Thu, Jul 19, 2018 at 11:56 AM, Michael Paquier <michael@paquier.xyz> wrote: > On Thu, Jul 19, 2018 at 10:41:10AM +0530, Ashutosh Bapat wrote: >> I had extensive testcases in my original patch-set to exercise that >> code but 1. that testset was too extensive; even today >> partition_join.sql is a separate testcase and it's quite large. 2. >> that function returns NULL rather than throwing an error, if it can >> not produce a parameterized path. So, unless we check whether each of >> those paths get created no test is useful and that can only be done >> through an EXPLAIN OUTPUT which means that the testcase becomes >> fragile. I fine if we want to add more tests just to cover the code if >> those are not as fragile and do not blow up partition_join too much. > > Did those really check the reparameterization of a MergeAppendPath for a > child of the parent? I'd be surprised if this one was stressed as there > was no match in the list. I don't remember but given this evident, it was not. But there are some testcases in partition_join which test this code using LATERAL joins. But those do not cover the entire function. -- Best Wishes, Ashutosh Bapat EnterpriseDB Corporation The Postgres Database Company
Commits
-
Fix print of Path nodes when using OPTIMIZER_DEBUG
- 3ecd6c4ab9dd 9.5.14 landed
- 164ed1532f78 9.6.10 landed
- 49d506dd2162 10.5 landed
- bc62aef53d68 11.0 landed
- b33ef397a169 12.0 landed
-
Fix re-parameterize of MergeAppendPath
- 6365ebacdd08 11.0 landed
- c6598b8b0514 12.0 landed