Re: Partition-wise aggregation/grouping
Ashutosh Bapat <ashutosh.bapat@enterprisedb.com>
Hi Jeevan,
I have started reviewing these patches.
0001 looks fine. There might be some changes that will be needed, but
those will be clear when I review the patch that uses this
refactoring.
0002
+ *
+ * If targetlist is provided, we use it else use targetlist from the root.
*/
static double
get_number_of_groups(PlannerInfo *root,
double path_rows,
- grouping_sets_data *gd)
+ grouping_sets_data *gd,
+ List *tlist)
{
Query *parse = root->parse;
double dNumGroups;
+ List *targetList = (tlist == NIL) ? parse->targetList : tlist;
May be we should just pass targetlist always. Instead of passing NIL,
pass parse->targetList directly. That would save us one conditional
assignment. May be passing NIL is required for the patches that use
this refactoring, but that's not clear as is in this patch.
0003
In the documenation of enable_partition_wise_aggregate, we should
probably explain why the default is off or like partition_wise_join
GUC, explain the consequences of turning it off. I doubt if we could
accept something like partition_wise_agg_cost_factor looks. But we can
discuss this at a later stage. Mean time it may be worthwhile to fix
the reason why we would require this GUC. If the regular aggregation
has cost lesser than partition-wise aggregation in most of the cases,
then probably we need to fix the cost model.
I will continue reviewing rest of the patches.
On Mon, Sep 18, 2017 at 12:37 PM, Jeevan Chalke
<jeevan.chalke@enterprisedb.com> wrote:
>
>
> On Tue, Sep 12, 2017 at 6:21 PM, Jeevan Chalke
> <jeevan.chalke@enterprisedb.com> wrote:
>>
>>
>>
>> On Tue, Sep 12, 2017 at 3:24 PM, Rajkumar Raghuwanshi
>> <rajkumar.raghuwanshi@enterprisedb.com> wrote:
>>>
>>>
>>> Hi Jeevan,
>>>
>>> I have started testing partition-wise-aggregate and got one observation,
>>> please take a look.
>>> with the v2 patch, here if I change target list order, query is not
>>> picking full partition-wise-aggregate.
>>
>>
>> Thanks Rajkumar for reporting this.
>>
>> I am looking into this issue and will post updated patch with the fix.
>
>
> Logic for checking whether partition keys lead group by keys needs to be
> updated here. The group by expressions can appear in any order without
> affecting the final result. And thus, the need for partition keys should
> be leading the group by keys to have full aggregation is not mandatory.
> Instead we must ensure that the partition keys are part of the group by
> keys to compute full aggregation on a partition.
>
> Attached, revised patch-set with above fix.
>
> Also, in test-cases, I have removed DROP/ANALYZE commands on child
> relations and also removed VERBOSE from the EXPLAIN.
>
> Notes:
> HEAD: 8edacab209957520423770851351ab4013cb0167
> Partition-wise Join patch-set version: v32
>
> Thanks
>
> --
> Jeevan Chalke
> Principal Software Engineer, Product Development
> EnterpriseDB Corporation
> The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company
>
>
>
> --
> Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org)
> To make changes to your subscription:
> http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
>
--
Best Wishes,
Ashutosh Bapat
EnterpriseDB Corporation
The Postgres Database Company
Commits
-
postgres_fdw: Push down partition-wise aggregation.
- 7e0d64c7a57e 11.0 landed
-
Remove 'target' from GroupPathExtraData.
- c1de1a3a8b93 11.0 landed
-
Implement partition-wise grouping/aggregation.
- e2f1eb0ee30d 11.0 landed
-
Don't pass the grouping target around unnecessarily.
- 94150513ec12 11.0 landed
-
Determine grouping strategies in create_grouping_paths.
- b5996c2791f3 11.0 landed
-
Defer creation of partially-grouped relation until it's needed.
- 4f15e5d09de2 11.0 landed
-
Split create_grouping_paths into degenerate and non-degenerate cases.
- 1466bcfa4a83 11.0 landed
-
Pass additional arguments to a couple of grouping-related functions.
- 648a6c7bd815 11.0 landed
-
Fix logic error in add_paths_to_partial_grouping_rel.
- 3bfe957761ac 11.0 landed
-
Minor cleanup of code related to partially_grouped_rel.
- 5e6a63c0d102 11.0 landed
-
Add a new upper planner relation for partially-aggregated results.
- 3bf05e096b9f 11.0 landed
-
Charge cpu_tuple_cost * 0.5 for Append and MergeAppend nodes.
- 7d8ac9814bc9 11.0 landed
-
Rename enable_partition_wise_join to enable_partitionwise_join
- 2fb1abaeb016 11.0 cited
-
Factor some code out of create_grouping_paths.
- 9fd8b7d63257 11.0 landed
-
Pad XLogReaderState's main_data buffer more aggressively.
- 8735978e7aeb 11.0 cited
-
Prevent int128 from requiring more than MAXALIGN alignment.
- 7518049980be 11.0 cited
-
Fix DROP SUBSCRIPTION hang
- 8edacab20995 11.0 cited
-
Inject $(ICU_LIBS) regardless of platform.
- 66ed3829df95 11.0 cited
-
Some preliminary refactoring towards partitionwise join.
- c44c47a773bd 10.0 cited