Re: Retiring some encodings?
Pavel Stehule <pavel.stehule@gmail.com>
From: Pavel Stehule <pavel.stehule@gmail.com>
To: Heikki Linnakangas <hlinnaka@iki.fi>
Cc: Michael Paquier <michael@paquier.xyz>, Postgres hackers <pgsql-hackers@lists.postgresql.org>
Date: 2025-05-22T12:05:03Z
Lists: pgsql-hackers
čt 22. 5. 2025 v 13:44 odesílatel Heikki Linnakangas <hlinnaka@iki.fi> napsal: > On 22/05/2025 08:54, Michael Paquier wrote: > > With all that in mind, I have wanted to kick a discussion about > > potentially removing one or more encodings from the core code, > > including the backend part, the frontend part and the conversion > > routines, coupled with checks in pg_upgrade to complain with database > > or collations include the so-said encoding (the collation part needs > > to be checked when not using ICU). Just being able to removing > > GB18030 would do us a favor in the long-term, at least, but there's > > more. > > +1 at high level for deprecating and removing conversions that are not > widely used anymore. As the first step, we can at least add a warning to > the documentation, that they will be removed in the future. > +1 Pavel > -- > Heikki Linnakangas > Neon (https://neon.tech) > > > >