Re: Global temporary tables
Pavel Stehule <pavel.stehule@gmail.com>
From: Pavel Stehule <pavel.stehule@gmail.com>
To: Andrew Dunstan <andrew@dunslane.net>
Cc: Dean Rasheed <dean.a.rasheed@gmail.com>, PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers@lists.postgresql.org>
Date: 2026-06-22T15:30:59Z
Lists: pgsql-hackers
Hi po 22. 6. 2026 v 15:43 odesílatel Andrew Dunstan <andrew@dunslane.net> napsal: > > > > On Jun 22, 2026, at 4:57 AM, Dean Rasheed <dean.a.rasheed@gmail.com> > wrote: > > > > On Sun, 21 Jun 2026 at 23:06, Andrew Dunstan <andrew@dunslane.net> > wrote: > >> > >> Wow, we're on the same track. I have a patch series for exactly this > >> feature that I was about to submit. > >> > >> FTR here's where I'm at. I'll try to take a look at yours ASAP. > > > > Oh, wow. There's a lot of similarity between our patchsets, which is > > reassuring, but there are also a number of differences, which I need > > to think about in more detail. > > Yeah, agree on both fronts. The main areas I see are the catalog and > handling wraparound. I don’t think there’s necessarily a clear winner on > either, so I’ll be interested to hear what others say. > next week I'll have free time, I can check these patches generally - global temporary tables is super useful for migration from other systems Regards Pavel > > Cheers > > Andrew > > > > >
Commits
-
doc: clarify MERGE PARTITIONS adjacency requirement
- 57f19774d6c8 master cited