Re: Schema variables - new implementation for Postgres 15

Pavel Stehule <pavel.stehule@gmail.com>

From: Pavel Stehule <pavel.stehule@gmail.com>
To: Julien Rouhaud <rjuju123@gmail.com>
Cc: Dean Rasheed <dean.a.rasheed@gmail.com>, Joel Jacobson <joel@compiler.org>, PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers@lists.postgresql.org>, Tomas Vondra <tomas.vondra@enterprisedb.com>
Date: 2022-01-26T13:43:54Z
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Commits

Same data as JSON: GET /api/v1/messages/:b64id/commits the thread's linked commits as JSON, with link sources. API reference →
  1. Allow underscores in integer and numeric constants.

  2. Remove special outfuncs/readfuncs handling of RangeVar.catalogname.

  3. Remove extra space from dumped ALTER DEFAULT PRIVILEGES.

  4. Create FKs properly when attaching table as partition

  5. psql: improve tab-complete's handling of variant SQL names.

> sessionvariable.c:
>
> + * Although session variables are not transactional, we don't
> + * want (and we cannot) to run cleaning immediately (when we
> + * got sinval message). The value of session variables can
> + * be still used or the operation that emits cleaning can be
> + * reverted. Unfortunatelly, this check can be done only in
> + * when transaction is committed (the check against system
> + * catalog requires transaction state).
>
> This was the original idea, but since there's now locking to make all DDL
> safe,
> the metadata should be considered fully transactional and no session should
> still be able to use a concurrently dropped variable.  Also, the
> invalidation
> messages are not sent until the transaction is committed.  So is that
> approach
> still needed (at least for things outside ON COMMIT DROP / ON TRANSACTION
> END
> RESET
>

I think this is still necessary. The lock protects the variable against
drop from the second session, but not for reverted deletion from the
current session.

This implementation is due Tomas's request for

CREATE VARIABLE xx AS int;
LET xx = 100;
BEGIN;
DROP VARIABLE xx;
ROLLBACK;
SELECT xx; --> 100

and the variable still holds the last value before DROP

Personally, this is a corner case (for me, and I think so for users it is
not too interesting, and important),  and this behavior is not necessary -
originally I implemented just the RESET variable in this case. On the other
hand, this is a nice feature, and there is an analogy with TRUNCATE
behavior.

More, I promised, as a second step, implementation of optional
transactional behavior of session variables. And related code is necessary
for it. So I prefer to use related code without change.

Regards

Pavel