Re: Schema variables - new implementation for Postgres 15
Pavel Stehule <pavel.stehule@gmail.com>
From: Pavel Stehule <pavel.stehule@gmail.com>
To: Julien Rouhaud <rjuju123@gmail.com>
Cc: Dean Rasheed <dean.a.rasheed@gmail.com>,
Joel Jacobson <joel@compiler.org>, PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers@lists.postgresql.org>, Tomas Vondra <tomas.vondra@enterprisedb.com>
Date: 2022-01-26T13:43:54Z
Lists: pgsql-hackers
Commits
Same data as JSON:
GET /api/v1/messages/:b64id/commits
the thread's linked commits as JSON, with link sources.
API reference →
-
Allow underscores in integer and numeric constants.
- faff8f8e47f1 16.0 cited
-
Remove special outfuncs/readfuncs handling of RangeVar.catalogname.
- 3cece34be842 16.0 cited
-
Remove extra space from dumped ALTER DEFAULT PRIVILEGES.
- 2af33369e794 16.0 cited
-
Create FKs properly when attaching table as partition
- b0284bfb1db5 16.0 cited
-
psql: improve tab-complete's handling of variant SQL names.
- 02b8048ba5dc 15.0 cited
> sessionvariable.c: > > + * Although session variables are not transactional, we don't > + * want (and we cannot) to run cleaning immediately (when we > + * got sinval message). The value of session variables can > + * be still used or the operation that emits cleaning can be > + * reverted. Unfortunatelly, this check can be done only in > + * when transaction is committed (the check against system > + * catalog requires transaction state). > > This was the original idea, but since there's now locking to make all DDL > safe, > the metadata should be considered fully transactional and no session should > still be able to use a concurrently dropped variable. Also, the > invalidation > messages are not sent until the transaction is committed. So is that > approach > still needed (at least for things outside ON COMMIT DROP / ON TRANSACTION > END > RESET > I think this is still necessary. The lock protects the variable against drop from the second session, but not for reverted deletion from the current session. This implementation is due Tomas's request for CREATE VARIABLE xx AS int; LET xx = 100; BEGIN; DROP VARIABLE xx; ROLLBACK; SELECT xx; --> 100 and the variable still holds the last value before DROP Personally, this is a corner case (for me, and I think so for users it is not too interesting, and important), and this behavior is not necessary - originally I implemented just the RESET variable in this case. On the other hand, this is a nice feature, and there is an analogy with TRUNCATE behavior. More, I promised, as a second step, implementation of optional transactional behavior of session variables. And related code is necessary for it. So I prefer to use related code without change. Regards Pavel