Re: proposal psql \gdesc
Pavel Stehule <pavel.stehule@gmail.com>
From: Pavel Stehule <pavel.stehule@gmail.com>
To: Fabien COELHO <coelho@cri.ensmp.fr>
Cc: PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org>
Date: 2017-05-09T19:10:03Z
Lists: pgsql-hackers
2017-05-09 20:37 GMT+02:00 Fabien COELHO <coelho@cri.ensmp.fr>: > > Hello Pavel, > > [...] it is little bit worse. I cannot to distinguish between SELECT\gdesc >> and TRUNCATE xxx\gdesc . All are valid commands and produce empty result, >> so result of \gdesc command should be empty result too. >> >> postgres=# truncate table xx\gdesc >> ┌──────┬──────┐ >> │ Name │ Type │ >> ╞══════╪══════╡ >> └──────┴──────┘ >> (0 rows) >> > > Hmmm. At least it is better than the previous error. > > What about detecting the empty result (eg PQntuples()==0?) and writing > "Empty result" instead of the strange looking empty table above? That would > just mean skipping the PrintQueryResult call in this case? PQntuples == 0 every time - the query is not executed. I am not sure, what is more correct. The "Empty result" string is not used every time in psql. For the case "SELECT;" the empty table is correct. For TRUNCATE and similar command I am not sure. The empty table is maybe unusual, but it is valid - like "SELECT;". The implementation is not problem in any case. The question is what is more natural for users a) the string "Empty result", b) empty table. I prefer @b due consistency with current behave (that is only reason, I have not any other). postgres=# select 'ahoj' where false; ┌──────────┐ │ ?column? │ ╞══════════╡ └──────────┘ (0 rows) > > > -- > Fabien.
Commits
-
Add \gdesc psql command.
- 49ca462eb165 11.0 landed