Re: proposal: schema variables
Pavel Stehule <pavel.stehule@gmail.com>
Commits
GET /api/v1/messages/:b64id/commits
the thread's linked commits as JSON, with link sources.
API reference →
-
Move WAL sequence code into its own file
- a87987cafca6 19 (unreleased) cited
-
Add ExplainState argument to pg_plan_query() and planner().
- c83ac02ec730 19 (unreleased) cited
-
Don't include access/htup_details.h in executor/tuptable.h
- 1a8b5b11e48a 19 (unreleased) cited
-
Refactor to avoid code duplication in transformPLAssignStmt.
- b0fb2c6aa5a4 19 (unreleased) cited
-
Avoid including commands/dbcommands.h in so many places
- 325fc0ab14d1 19 (unreleased) cited
-
Restrict psql meta-commands in plain-text dumps.
- 71ea0d679543 19 (unreleased) cited
-
Split func.sgml into more manageable pieces
- 4e23c9ef65ac 19 (unreleased) cited
-
Fix squashing algorithm for query texts
- 0f65f3eec478 18.0 cited
-
EXPLAIN: Always use two fractional digits for row counts.
- 95dbd827f2ed 18.0 cited
-
Preliminary refactoring of plpgsql expression construction.
- a654af21ae52 18.0 cited
-
plpgsql: pure parser and reentrant scanner
- 7b27f5fd36cb 18.0 cited
-
Add some sanity checks in executor for query ID reporting
- 24f520594809 18.0 cited
-
Fix misleading error message context
- 4af123ad45bd 18.0 cited
-
Add macros for looping through a List without a ListCell.
- 14dd0f27d7cd 17.0 cited
st 20. 11. 2024 v 21:14 odesílatel Dmitry Dolgov <9erthalion6@gmail.com> napsal: > > On Tue, Nov 19, 2024 at 08:14:01PM +0100, Pavel Stehule wrote: > > Hi > > > > I wrote POC of VARIABLE(varname) syntax support > > Thanks, the results look good. I'm still opposed the idea of having a > warning, and think it has to be an error -- but it's my subjective > opinion. Lets see if there are more votes on that topic. > The error breaks the possibility to use variables (session variables) like Oracle's package variables easily. It increases effort for transformation or porting because you should identify variables inside queries and you should wrap it to fence. On the other hand, extensions that can read a query after transformation can easily detect unwrapped variables and they can raise an error. It can be very easy to implement this check to plpgsql_check for example or like plpgsql.extra_check. In my ideal world, the shadowing warning should be enabled by default, and an unfencing warning disabled by default. But I have not a problem with activating both warnings by default. I think warnings are enough, because if there is some risk then a shadowing warning is activated. And my experience is more positive about warnings, people read it. Regards Pavel