Re: proposal - plpgsql - support standard syntax for named arguments for cursors
Pavel Stehule <pavel.stehule@gmail.com>
From: Pavel Stehule <pavel.stehule@gmail.com>
To: Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
Cc: PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers@lists.postgresql.org>
Date: 2025-02-08T19:56:28Z
Lists: pgsql-hackers
Hi so 8. 2. 2025 v 20:25 odesílatel Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> napsal: > Pavel Stehule <pavel.stehule@gmail.com> writes: > > I propose to enhancing to ANSI/SQL standard syntax for named arguments > > `argname => value` > > Is there any reason to think that that's actually in the standard? > I poked around in SQL:2021 a little and couldn't find anything about > cursors with arguments at all. > I think the possibility to use named arguments in OPEN statements is a PostgreSQL proprietary feature. And usage of cursors in PL/pgSQL is based on PL/SQL (not on SQL/PSM from standard), but named arguments for cursor is PostgreSQL proprietary feature and the syntax based on usage `:=` is our proprietary too. This is from patch https://github.com/postgres/postgres/commit/4adead1d224278ff3064636063a818eba17cb211 It is from the window, when the named arguments was supported already https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/20091008023926.1BE85753FB7@cvs.postgresql.org (the syntax was changed before release) but not with ANSI syntax https://github.com/postgres/postgres/commit/865f14a2d31af23a05bbf2df04c274629c5d5c4d I forgot to fix this in my patch for 9.5 - probably I missed this functionality Regards Pavel > > regards, tom lane >
Commits
-
Allow => syntax for named cursor arguments in plpgsql.
- 246dedc5d028 18.0 landed
-
Allow named parameters to be specified using => in addition to :=
- 865f14a2d31a 9.5.0 cited
-
Add support for passing cursor parameters in named notation in PL/pgSQL.
- 4adead1d2242 9.2.0 cited