Re: review: CHECK FUNCTION statement

Pavel Stehule <pavel.stehule@gmail.com>

From: Pavel Stehule <pavel.stehule@gmail.com>

To: Alvaro Herrera <alvherre@commandprompt.com>

Cc: Petr Jelínek <pjmodos@pjmodos.net>, Greg Smith <greg@2ndquadrant.com>, Pg Hackers <pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org>, Albe Laurenz <laurenz.albe@wien.gv.at>

Date: 2012-02-28T20:41:13Z

Lists: pgsql-hackers

Commits

Same data as JSON: GET /api/v1/messages/:b64id/commits the thread's linked commits as JSON, with link sources. API reference →

Add const qualifiers to node inspection functions
- d5f23af6bfbc 9.2.0 cited

Attachments

check_function-2012-02-28-3.diff.gz (application/x-gzip) patch 2012

2012/2/28 Alvaro Herrera <alvherre@commandprompt.com>:
>
> Excerpts from Pavel Stehule's message of mar feb 28 16:30:58 -0300 2012:
>
>> I refreshed patch for current git repository.
>
> Thanks, I'll have a look.
>
> Oh, another thing -- you shouldn't patch the 1.0 version of the plpgsql
> extension.  Rather I think you should produce a 1.1 version.
>

there is patch with updated tag. I am not sure if there are some
changes in pg_upgrade are necessary??

Regards and thank you

Pavel

> --
> Álvaro Herrera <alvherre@commandprompt.com>
> The PostgreSQL Company - Command Prompt, Inc.
> PostgreSQL Replication, Consulting, Custom Development, 24x7 support