Re: [Proposal] Global temporary tables
Pavel Stehule <pavel.stehule@gmail.com>
From: Pavel Stehule <pavel.stehule@gmail.com>
To: Andres Freund <andres@anarazel.de>
Cc: Justin Pryzby <pryzby@telsasoft.com>, wenjing <wenjing@gmail.com>, Andrew Bille <andrewbille@gmail.com>, Tony Zhu <Tony.zhu@ww-it.cn>, PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers@lists.postgresql.org>
Date: 2022-03-03T01:35:02Z
Lists: pgsql-hackers
Commits
Same data as JSON:
GET /api/v1/messages/:b64id/commits
the thread's linked commits as JSON, with link sources.
API reference →
-
PageAddItemExtended(): Add LP_UNUSED assertion.
- 30aaab26e521 14.0 cited
-
Remove temporary files after backend crash
- cd91de0d1795 14.0 cited
-
Fix comment in indexing.c
- 9fd2952cf492 14.0 cited
-
Fix failure to ignore leftover temp tables after a server crash.
- 6919b7e32947 9.3.0 cited
Hi > I think you'd basically have to come up with a generic design for > partitioning > catalog tables into local / non-local storage, without needing explicit > code > for each catalog. That could also be used to store the default catalog > contents separately from user defined ones (e.g. pg_proc is pretty large). > There is still a risk of bloating in local storage, but, mainly, you probably have to modify a lot of lines because the system cache doesn't support partitioning. Regards Pavel > > Greetings, > > Andres Freund >