Re: JSON output functions.

Pavel Stehule <pavel.stehule@gmail.com>

From: Pavel Stehule <pavel.stehule@gmail.com>
To: Andrew Dunstan <andrew@dunslane.net>
Cc: Abhijit Menon-Sen <ams@toroid.org>, pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org
Date: 2012-02-02T17:20:26Z
Lists: pgsql-hackers
2012/2/2 Andrew Dunstan <andrew@dunslane.net>:
>
>
> On 02/02/2012 04:35 AM, Abhijit Menon-Sen wrote:
>>
>> At 2012-02-01 18:48:28 -0500, andrew.dunstan@pgexperts.com wrote:
>>>
>>> For now I'm inclined not to proceed with that, and leave it as an
>>> optimization to be considered later if necessary. Thoughts?
>>
>> I agree, there doesn't seem to be a pressing need to do it now.
>>
>
>
> OK, here's my final version of the patch for constructor functions. If
> there's no further comment I'll go with this.

These function are super, Thank you

Do you plan to fix a issue with row attribute names in 9.2?

Regards

Pavel

>
> cheers
>
> andrew
>
>
>
> --
> Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org)
> To make changes to your subscription:
> http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
>