Re: [HACKERS] Optional message to user when terminating/cancelling backend
Pavel Stehule <pavel.stehule@gmail.com>
From: Pavel Stehule <pavel.stehule@gmail.com>
To: Daniel Gustafsson <daniel@yesql.se>
Cc: Heikki Linnakangas <hlinnaka@iki.fi>, Andres Freund <andres@anarazel.de>, Onder Kalaci <onder@citusdata.com>, PostgreSQL mailing lists <pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org>
Date: 2018-08-12T05:42:50Z
Lists: pgsql-hackers
2018-08-12 0:17 GMT+02:00 Daniel Gustafsson <daniel@yesql.se>: > > On 6 Aug 2018, at 09:47, Heikki Linnakangas <hlinnaka@iki.fi> wrote: > > > > Has there been any consideration to encodings? > > Thats a good point, no =/ > > > What happens if the message contains non-ASCII characters, and the > sending backend is connected to database that uses a different encoding > than the backend being signaled? > > In the current state of the patch, instead of the message you get: > > FATAL: character with byte sequence 0xe3 0x82 0xbd in encoding "UTF8" > has > no equivalent in encoding “ISO_8859_5" > Where this code fails? Isn't somewhere upper where string literals are translated? Then this message is ok. > > Thats clearly not good enough, but I’m not entirely sure what would be the > best > way forward. Restrict messages to only be in SQL_ASCII? Store the > encoding of > the message and check the encoding of the receiving backend before issuing > it > for a valid conversion, falling back to no message in case there is none? > Neither seems terribly appealing, do you have any better suggestions? > The client<->server encoding translation should do this work no? Regards Pavel > cheers ./daniel
Commits
-
Refactor user-facing SQL functions signalling backends
- 09921f397b84 12.0 landed
-
Introduce 64-bit hash functions with a 64-bit seed.
- 81c5e46c490e 11.0 cited