Horton

Re: [Proposal] Global temporary tables

Pavel Stehule <pavel.stehule@gmail.com>

View thread
From: Pavel Stehule <pavel.stehule@gmail.com>
To: 曾文旌(义从) <wenjing.zwj@alibaba-inc.com>
Cc: Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com>, Tomas Vondra <tomas.vondra@2ndquadrant.com>, Konstantin Knizhnik <k.knizhnik@postgrespro.ru>, PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org>, 蔡松露(子嘉) <zijia@taobao.com>, "Cai, Le" <le.cai@alibaba-inc.com>, 萧少聪(铁庵) <shaocong.xsc@alibaba-inc.com>
Date: 2020-01-28T16:40:14Z
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Commits

Same data as JSON: GET /api/v1/messages/:b64id/commits the thread's linked commits as JSON, with link sources. API reference →

  1. PageAddItemExtended(): Add LP_UNUSED assertion.

  2. Remove temporary files after backend crash

  3. Fix comment in indexing.c

  4. Fix failure to ignore leftover temp tables after a server crash.

út 28. 1. 2020 v 17:01 odesílatel 曾文旌(义从) <wenjing.zwj@alibaba-inc.com>
napsal:

>
>
> 2020年1月24日 上午4:47，Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com> 写道：
>
> On Sat, Jan 11, 2020 at 8:51 PM Tomas Vondra
> <tomas.vondra@2ndquadrant.com> wrote:
>
> I proposed just ignoring those new indexes because it seems much simpler
> than alternative solutions that I can think of, and it's not like those
> other solutions don't have other issues.
>
>
> +1.
>
> I complete the implementation of this feature.
> When a session x create an index idx_a on GTT A then
> For session x, idx_a is valid when after create index.
> For session y, before session x create index done, GTT A has some data,
> then index_a is invalid.
> For session z, before session x create index done, GTT A has no data,
> then index_a is valid.
>
>
> For example, I've looked at the "on demand" building as implemented in
> global_private_temp-8.patch, I kinda doubt adding a bunch of index build
> calls into various places in index code seems somewht suspicious.
>
>
> +1. I can't imagine that's a safe or sane thing to do.
>
> --
> Robert Haas
> EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
> The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company
>
>
> Opinion by Pavel
> + rel->rd_islocaltemp = true;  <<<<<<< if this is valid, then the name of
> field "rd_islocaltemp" is not probably best
> I renamed rd_islocaltemp
>

I don't see any change?



> Opinion by Konstantin Knizhnik
> 1 Fixed comments
> 2 Fixed assertion
>
>
> Please help me review.
>
>
> Wenjing
>
>