Re: proposal: schema variables

Pavel Stehule <pavel.stehule@gmail.com>

From: Pavel Stehule <pavel.stehule@gmail.com>
To: Erik Rijkers <er@xs4all.nl>
Cc: Michael Paquier <michael@paquier.xyz>, Zhihong Yu <zyu@yugabyte.com>, Amit Kapila <amit.kapila16@gmail.com>, DUVAL REMI <REMI.DUVAL@cheops.fr>, PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers@lists.postgresql.org>
Date: 2021-01-10T16:54:48Z
Lists: pgsql-hackers, pgsql-performance

Commits

Same data as JSON: GET /api/v1/messages/:b64id/commits the thread's linked commits as JSON, with link sources. API reference →
  1. Move WAL sequence code into its own file

  2. Add ExplainState argument to pg_plan_query() and planner().

  3. Don't include access/htup_details.h in executor/tuptable.h

  4. Refactor to avoid code duplication in transformPLAssignStmt.

  5. Avoid including commands/dbcommands.h in so many places

  6. Restrict psql meta-commands in plain-text dumps.

  7. Split func.sgml into more manageable pieces

  8. Fix squashing algorithm for query texts

  9. EXPLAIN: Always use two fractional digits for row counts.

  10. Preliminary refactoring of plpgsql expression construction.

  11. plpgsql: pure parser and reentrant scanner

  12. Add some sanity checks in executor for query ID reporting

  13. Fix misleading error message context

  14. Add macros for looping through a List without a ListCell.

Attachments

pá 8. 1. 2021 v 18:54 odesílatel Erik Rijkers <er@xs4all.nl> napsal:

> On 2021-01-08 07:20, Pavel Stehule wrote:
> > Hi
> >
> > just rebase
> >
> > [schema-variables-20200108.patch]
>
> Hey Pavel,
>
> My gcc 8.3.0 compile says:
> (on debian 10/Buster)
>
> utility.c: In function ‘CreateCommandTag’:
> utility.c:2332:8: warning: this statement may fall through
> [-Wimplicit-fallthrough=]
>      tag = CMDTAG_SELECT;
>      ~~~~^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
> utility.c:2334:3: note: here
>     case T_LetStmt:
>     ^~~~
>

yes, there was an error from the last rebase. Fixed


>
> compile, check, check-world, runs without further problem.
>
> I also changed a few typos/improvements in the documentation, see
> attached.
>
> One thing I wasn't sure of: I have assumed that
>    ON TRANSACTIONAL END RESET
>
> should be
>    ON TRANSACTION END RESET
>
> and changed it accordingly, please double-check.
>

It looks well, I merged these changes to patch. Thank you very much for
these corectures

Updated patch attached

Regards

Pavel


>
> Erik Rijkers
>