Re: ecmascript 5 DATESTYLE

Pavel Stehule <pavel.stehule@gmail.com>

From: Pavel Stehule <pavel.stehule@gmail.com>

To: ben hockey <neonstalwart@gmail.com>

Cc: Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>, Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com>, Mike Fowler <mike@mlfowler.com>, Peter Eisentraut <peter_e@gmx.net>, pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org

Date: 2011-12-06T22:24:50Z

Lists: pgsql-hackers

Hello

2011/12/6 ben hockey <neonstalwart@gmail.com>:
> i may have spoken a little too soon about the format being right...  i just
> took a look at the postgres source code and it would need one more change to
> completely meet my needs.  EncodeDateTime should put a 'Z' for UTC timezone
> rather than '+0'.  with this being the case, do you think there would need
> to be an ECMA datestyle or would XSD be compatible with this change?
>

probably we can't to change a XSD format - but new format, that is
exactly ECMA should not be problem.

> i haven't touched any c code in quite a while but the changes look simple
> enough that i could work towards an ECMA patch if that's the best way to go
> about this.

you can become a postgreql's hacker :) - anybody starts on simple jobs

PostgreSQL hacking is good lecture


Pavel

>
> thanks,
>
> ben...