Re: proposal: minscale, rtrim, btrim functions for numeric

Pavel Stehule <pavel.stehule@gmail.com>

From: Pavel Stehule <pavel.stehule@gmail.com>
To: "Karl O. Pinc" <kop@meme.com>
Cc: Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>, PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers@lists.postgresql.org>, Marko Tiikkaja <marko@joh.to>, Dean Rasheed <dean.a.rasheed@gmail.com>, Alvaro Herrera <alvherre@2ndquadrant.com>, Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com>
Date: 2019-12-10T13:47:03Z
Lists: pgsql-hackers
út 10. 12. 2019 v 13:56 odesílatel Karl O. Pinc <kop@meme.com> napsal:

> On Tue, 10 Dec 2019 07:11:59 +0100
> Pavel Stehule <pavel.stehule@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> > út 10. 12. 2019 v 0:03 odesílatel Karl O. Pinc <kop@meme.com> napsal:
> > > I also wonder whether all the trim_scale() tests
> > > are now necessary, but not enough to make any suggestions.
>
> > I don't think so tests should be minimalistic - there can be some
> > redundancy to coverage some less probable size effects of some future
> > changes. More - there is a small symmetry with min_scale tests - and
> > third argument - some times I use tests (result part) as
> > "documentation".
>
> Fine with me.
>
> Tests pass against HEAD.  Docs build and look good.
> Patch looks good to me.
>
> I'm marking it ready for a committer.
>
> Thanks for the work.
>

Thank you for review

Pavel


> Regards,
>
> Karl <kop@meme.com>
> Free Software:  "You don't pay back, you pay forward."
>                  -- Robert A. Heinlein
>

Commits

  1. Add functions min_scale(numeric) and trim_scale(numeric).