Horton

Re: Schema variables - new implementation for Postgres 15

Pavel Stehule <pavel.stehule@gmail.com>

View thread
From: Pavel Stehule <pavel.stehule@gmail.com>
To: Justin Pryzby <pryzby@telsasoft.com>
Cc: Tomas Vondra <tomas.vondra@enterprisedb.com>, Jaime Casanova <jcasanov@systemguards.com.ec>, Erik Rijkers <er@xs4all.nl>, Gilles Darold <gilles@darold.net>, PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers@lists.postgresql.org>, Michael Paquier <michael@paquier.xyz>, Amit Kapila <amit.kapila16@gmail.com>, Tomas Vondra <tomas.vondra@2ndquadrant.com>, Peter Eisentraut <peter.eisentraut@enterprisedb.com>, Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>, Alvaro Herrera <alvherre@2ndquadrant.com>, Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com>
Date: 2021-11-17T06:32:31Z
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Commits

Same data as JSON: GET /api/v1/messages/:b64id/commits the thread's linked commits as JSON, with link sources. API reference →

  1. Allow underscores in integer and numeric constants.

  2. Remove special outfuncs/readfuncs handling of RangeVar.catalogname.

  3. Remove extra space from dumped ALTER DEFAULT PRIVILEGES.

  4. Create FKs properly when attaching table as partition

  5. psql: improve tab-complete's handling of variant SQL names.

po 15. 11. 2021 v 21:23 odesílatel Justin Pryzby <pryzby@telsasoft.com>
napsal:

> On Mon, Nov 15, 2021 at 09:00:13PM +0100, Pavel Stehule wrote:
> > Thank you for review and fixes, I try to complete some version for next
> > work, and looks so your patch 0001 is broken
> >
> > gedit reports to me broken unicode \A0\A0\A0\A0\A0
> >
> > my last patch has 276KB and your patch has 293KB?
>
> On Mon, Nov 15, 2021 at 09:06:08PM +0100, Pavel Stehule wrote:
> > >
> > > my last patch has 276KB and your patch has 293KB?
> >
> > Please, can you resend your version of patch 0001?
>
> https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/20211106013904.GG17618@telsasoft.com
>
> 0001 is exactly your patch applied to HEAD, and 0002 are Tomas' changes
> relative to your patch.
>
> 0003 is my contribution on top.  My intent is that you wouldn't apply
> 0001, but
> rather apply my 0003 on top of your existing branch, and then review
> 0002/0003,
> and then squish the changes into your patch.
>
> I see the 0xa0 stuff in your original patch before my changes, but I'm not
> sure
> what went wrong.
>
> Let me know if you have any issue applying my changes on top of your
> existing,
> local branch ?
>

It is ok, I was able to apply all your patches to my local branch

Regards

Pavel

>
> --
> Justin
>