Re: Assert single row returning SQL-standard functions

pá 29. 8. 2025 v 11:51 odesílatel Joel Jacobson <joel@compiler.org> napsal:

> On Fri, Aug 29, 2025, at 10:30, Pavel Stehule wrote:
> > pá 29. 8. 2025 v 10:16 odesílatel Joel Jacobson <joel@compiler.org>
> napsal:
> >> Can we think of some SQL-standard function way to also prevent against
> 0 rows?
> >>
> >
> > I am afraid there is not nothing. NULL is the correct result in SQL.
> > SQL allow to check ROW_COUNT by using GET DIAGNOSTICS commands and
> > raising an error when something is unexpected
> >
> > I can imagine allowing the NOT NULL flag for functions, and then the
> > result can be checked on NOT NULL value.
>
> I like the idea of a NOT NULL flag for functions.
> What syntax could we image for that?
>

CREATE OR REPLACE FUNCTION foo() RETURNS int NOT NULL AS $$ SELECT 10 $$
LANGUAGE ...



>
> Regarding DML functions, could we make the RETURN () trick work somehow?
>
> Here is a failed attempt:
>
> CREATE OR REPLACE FUNCTION test_update(_a int)
> RETURNS bool
> RETURN (
>     WITH update_cte AS (
>         UPDATE footab SET id = _a WHERE footab.id = _a RETURNING footab.id
>     )
>     SELECT id FROM update_cte
> );
>
> ERROR:  WITH clause containing a data-modifying statement must be at the
> top level
> LINE 4:     WITH update_cte AS (
>                  ^
>
> I'm not sure if this is a standard requirement, or if it's just a
> PostgreSQL-specific limitation?
>

I am not sure in this case - I think so this syntax is maybe proprietary -
so it is not defined in standard, I cannot remember for ANSI/SQL syntax now.

any limit related to "top level" is PostgreSQL related




> /Joel
>