Horton

Re: Patch: Global Unique Index

Pavel Stehule <pavel.stehule@gmail.com>

View thread
From: Pavel Stehule <pavel.stehule@gmail.com>
To: Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
Cc: Sergei Kornilov <sk@zsrv.org>, Cary Huang <cary.huang@highgo.ca>, Pgsql Hackers <pgsql-hackers@lists.postgresql.org>
Date: 2022-11-18T15:14:44Z
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Commits

Same data as JSON: GET /api/v1/messages/:b64id/commits the thread's linked commits as JSON, with link sources. API reference →

  1. Apply a better fix to mdunlinkfork().

pá 18. 11. 2022 v 16:06 odesílatel Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> napsal:

> Sergei Kornilov <sk@zsrv.org> writes:
> > Do we need new syntax actually? I think that a global unique index can
> be created automatically instead of raising an error "unique constraint on
> partitioned table must include all partitioning columns"
>
> I'm not convinced that we want this feature at all: as far as I can see,
> it will completely destroy the benefits of making a partitioned table
> in the first place.  But if we do want it, I don't think it should be
> so easy to create a global index by accident as that syntax approach
> would make it.  I think there needs to be a pretty clear YES I WANT TO
> SHOOT MYSELF IN THE FOOT clause in the command.
>

isn't possible to have a partitioned index?

https://www.highgo.ca/2022/10/14/global-index-a-different-approach/

Regards

Pavel


>
>                         regards, tom lane
>
>
>