Re: SLRU optimization - configurable buffer pool and partitioning the SLRU lock

Dilip Kumar <dilipbalaut@gmail.com>

From: Dilip Kumar <dilipbalaut@gmail.com>
To: "Andrey M. Borodin" <x4mmm@yandex-team.ru>
Cc: Alvaro Herrera <alvherre@alvh.no-ip.org>, PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers@lists.postgresql.org>
Date: 2023-11-20T11:12:43Z
Lists: pgsql-hackers
On Mon, Nov 20, 2023 at 2:37 PM Andrey M. Borodin <x4mmm@yandex-team.ru> wrote:

> > On 20 Nov 2023, at 13:51, Dilip Kumar <dilipbalaut@gmail.com> wrote:
> >
> > 2) Do we really need one separate lwlock tranche for each SLRU?
> >
> > IMHO if we use the same lwlock tranche then the wait event will show
> > the same wait event name, right? And that would be confusing for the
> > user, whether we are waiting for Subtransaction or Multixact or
> > anything else.  Is my understanding no correct here?
>
> If we give to a user multiple GUCs to tweak, I think we should give a way to understand which GUC to tweak when they observe wait times.

+1

-- 
Regards,
Dilip Kumar
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com



Commits

  1. Fix zeroing of pg_serial page without SLRU bank lock

  2. Fix misspelled assertions

  3. GUC table: Add description to computed variables

  4. Improve performance of subsystems on top of SLRU

  5. Rename SLRU elements in view pg_stat_slru

  6. Use atomic access for SlruShared->latest_page_number

  7. Split use of SerialSLRULock, creating SerialControlLock

  8. Index SLRUs by 64-bit integers rather than by 32-bit integers

  9. Add a macro templatized hashtable.