Re: suboverflowed subtransactions concurrency performance optimize
Dilip Kumar <dilipbalaut@gmail.com>
From: Dilip Kumar <dilipbalaut@gmail.com>
To: Simon Riggs <simon.riggs@enterprisedb.com>
Cc: Andrey Borodin <x4mmm@yandex-team.ru>,
Pengchengliu <pengchengliu@tju.edu.cn>, PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org>
Date: 2021-12-03T06:26:58Z
Lists: pgsql-hackers
On Tue, Nov 30, 2021 at 5:49 PM Simon Riggs <simon.riggs@enterprisedb.com> wrote: > transam.c uses a single item cache to prevent thrashing from repeated > lookups, which reduces problems with shared access to SLRUs. > multitrans.c also has similar. > > I notice that subtrans. doesn't have this, but could easily do so. > Patch attached, which seems separate to other attempts at tuning. Yeah, this definitely makes sense. > On review, I think it is also possible that we update subtrans ONLY if > someone uses >PGPROC_MAX_CACHED_SUBXIDS. > This would make subtrans much smaller and avoid one-entry-per-page > which is a major source of cacheing. > This would means some light changes in GetSnapshotData(). > Let me know if that seems interesting also? Do you mean to say avoid setting the sub-transactions parent if the number of sun-transactions is not crossing PGPROC_MAX_CACHED_SUBXIDS? But the TransactionIdDidCommit(), might need to fetch the parent if the transaction status is TRANSACTION_STATUS_SUB_COMMITTED, so how would we handle that? -- Regards, Dilip Kumar EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
Commits
-
Revert "Add single-item cache when looking at topmost XID of a subtrans XID"
- b4529005fd38 15.0 landed
-
Add single-item cache when looking at topmost XID of a subtrans XID
- 06f5295af673 15.0 landed
-
Fix handling of partitioned index in RelationGetNumberOfBlocksInFork()
- 0d906b2c0b1f 15.0 cited